<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>firsttube.com &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firsttube.com/tag/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firsttube.com</link>
	<description>crunchy nuggets, served semi-daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://firsttube.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Thank a Plugin Developer Day</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/thank-a-plugin-developer-day/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/thank-a-plugin-developer-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Mullenweg, creator of Wordpress and skipper of Automattic, has declared today, January 28, &#8220;Thank a Plugin Developer&#8221; Day.  In thanks, I will list all of the plugins I use in my firsttube.com Wordpress install.

Akismet is a comment filter that uses a &#8220;karma&#8221; type algorithm to analyze comments and separate ham from spam.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ma.tt/">Matt Mullenweg</a>, creator of Wordpress and skipper of <a href="http://automattic.com">Automattic</a>, has declared today, January 28, <a href="http://ma.tt/2009/01/4000-plugins/">&#8220;Thank a Plugin Developer&#8221; Day</a>.  In thanks, I will list all of the plugins I use in my <a href='http://firsttube.com'>firsttube.com</a> Wordpress install.</p>
<ul class="list">
<li><a href="http://akismet.com/">Akismet</a> is a comment filter that uses a &#8220;karma&#8221; type algorithm to analyze comments and separate ham from spam.  According to my internal stats, Akismet reports 37,512 spams caught, 284 legitimate comments, and an overall accuracy rate of 99.934%. Not too shabby.  As a result, this site no longer has a captcha.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bravenewcode.com/blipit/">Blip.It iPhone Handler</a> is a neat little tool that creates a method to display embedded flash as Quicktime on-the-fly, ideal for iPhone compatibility.</li>
<li><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/cache-images/">Cache Images</a>, another Mullenweg gem, let me fetch remote images and store them locally.  I prefer to host all images locally if possible, so this is fantastic.</li>
<li>&#8220;ftBlogrollerWP (ft)&#8221; is my own modified plugin that creates a page with all of my links, as seen <a href="http://firsttube.com/links">here</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.arnebrachhold.de/redir/sitemap-home/">Google XML Sitemaps</a> is a tool for creating a sitemap that Google and other search engines can use to spider your site.  This would take forever by hand and would be very hard to keep up manually, but this plugin makes it effortless.</li>
<li><a href="http://devel.kostdoktorn.se/limit-login-attempts">Limit Login Attempts</a>.  No sense in letting someone hammer your Wordpress admin login eternally.  Basic security that ought to be part of Wordpress core.</li>
<li><a href="http://rmarsh.com/plugins/similar-posts/">Similar Posts</a> is a snazzy little plugin that tries to find similar posts to any given post.  I use this on each post&#8217;s page.  In pre-Wordpress firsttube, I did this by searching for other articles with the same tags.  In Wordpress-era ft, I do this via a plugin.  Similar Posts requires the <a href="http://rmarsh.com/plugins/post-plugin-library/">Post-Plugin Library</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://op111.net/p65">Tangofy</a> is a simple plugin to modify icons in the stock Wordpress admin pages.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.templature.com/2007/10/18/ttftitles-wordpress-plugin/">TTFTitles</a> is a sweet little plugin that creates images from text.  I do this on entry titles and sidebar titles.  It allows you to add a dimension of professional typography and to use fonts that aren&#8217;t in the eight &#8220;web safe.&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/wp-db-backup">WordPress Database Backup</a>: you&#8217;ll never guess what this one does!</li>
<li><a href="http://wordpress-plugins.feifei.us/hashcash/">WordPress Hashcash</a> does the spam filtering in conjunction with Akismet.  Whatever Akismet misses, Hashcash catches.  Essentially, it catches *everything* Akismet misses and only really reports problems when users have javascript turned off.</li>
<li><a href="http://rauru.com/wordpress-popular-posts">Wordpress Popular Posts</a> provide me view counts, plain and simple.  I used to keep track pre-Wordpress, but sadly, I lost my hit count (many of which were in the thens of thousands of views) and only started again this month.  Nonetheless, it&#8217;s in the sidebar.</li>
<li><a href="http://mnm.uib.es/gallir/wp-cache-2/">wp-cache</a> is a caching program, but I&#8217;m not currently using the cache.</li>
<li><a href="http://grupenet.com/2007/08/03/wp-lytebox/">WP-Lytebox</a> automatically adds a lytebox effect to inline images, which is spectacular.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ruhanirabin.com/wp-optimize/">WP-Optimize</a> is a database optimizer that does optimization not only of MySQL overhead, but also removes autosaves and other space wasters from your database.</li>
<li><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-syntax/">WP-Syntax</a> makes my code pretty, and that&#8217;s all.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.beardygeek.com/">WP iPaper</a> is a plugin for embedding <a href="http://scribd.com">scribd</a> stuff.</li>
<li>Lastly, <a href="http://bravenewcode.com/wptouch/">WPtouch iPhone Theme</a> is a stylesheet that makes this site look native on the iPhone.  It&#8217;s truly a beautiful skin.</li>
</ul>
<p>That is all.  Thank you to all the above developers. As a reward, please accept this pingback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/thank-a-plugin-developer-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Knew that iTunes was so cool?</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/who-knew-that-itunes-was-so-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/who-knew-that-itunes-was-so-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps it was just me, but I had no idea how cool iTunes was until last night.  I&#8217;ve used iTunes exclusively for my master music collection for about 5 years now, and, in that time, I&#8217;ve been very focused with my music collection.  I can&#8217;t say the same for my video collection.   Only recently, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it was just me, but I had no idea how cool iTunes was until last night.  I&#8217;ve used iTunes exclusively for my master music collection for about 5 years now, and, in that time, I&#8217;ve been very focused with my music collection.  I can&#8217;t say the same for my video collection.   Only recently, as I began working with my AppleTV, did I actually allow video into my iTunes library.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve got a brilliant combination working now.  <a href="http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/19769/isquint">iSquint</a>, the gorgeous free video editor, converts my files into high quality mp4/m4v files and adds them to iTunes.  iTunes then pushes them to my AppleTV.   It&#8217;s incredible to tell iSquint to covert several dozen videos and then the next morning they are waiting on my AppleTV. </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/12/picture-3.jpg" rel='lytebox[who-knew-that-itunes-was-so-cool]'><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-991" title="iTunes 8 Sorting" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/12/picture-3-300x263.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="263" /></a>In the meantime, I just discovered something on iTunes that I hadn&#8217;t realized existed.  I went into the overcrowded &#8220;Movies&#8221; section of my iTunes library and found that you can convert &#8220;Movies&#8221; to &#8220;TV Shows.&#8221; Here&#8217;s the best part, by filling in the metadata &#8211; by adding the TV show title, the season, the episode, iTunes will properly group and organize them.  Whereas before, I had a huge section of movies, randomly plunked down in the same view, now I have a view of many logically grouped subsets, much the way iTunes handles artists and albums in grid view.  </p>
<p> Furthermore, AppleTV obeys the organization as well! Instead of a silly, long list of movies, I go to TV Shows and then drill down by show, where they are sorted by season and episode.  </p>
<p>Using iTunes just got much better.  I had been thinking, lately, about how well music organization works in iTunes and how poorly video organization does.  I still think that&#8217;s the case &#8211; Videos are a mess.  But TV Shows and Music Videos work well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/who-knew-that-itunes-was-so-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox: Like An Old Shoe</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/like-an-old-shoe/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/like-an-old-shoe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had a long and painful war with which browser to use on my Windows machine at work.  Firefox has let me down many times before, and the Mozilla Firefox developers have disappointed me.  So I switched to Opera, and it&#8217;s made me very happy. I have really learned to love Speed Dial, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_780" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/08/operabrowser.jpg" rel='lytebox[like-an-old-shoe]'><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-780" title="Opera Browser" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/08/operabrowser-150x150.jpg" alt="Opera Browser" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Opera Browser</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a long and painful war with which browser to use on my Windows machine at work.  <a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/firefox">Firefox has let me down many times before</a>, and the <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/A-Final-Word-on-the-Firefox-Fiasco/">Mozilla Firefox developers have disappointed me</a>.  So <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/Take-Three-Enter-Opera/">I switched to Opera</a>, and it&#8217;s made me very happy. I have really learned to love Speed Dial, and user javascript is nice.  I enjoy the built-in BitTorrent client, the fact that it runs all day without consuming a terabyte of virtual memory, and the fact that it&#8217;s about as standards compliant as it gets.  But, I&#8217;ve had my share of problems with it &#8212; small problems that, for the most part, are tiny nitpicks that on most days wouldn&#8217;t bug me too much.  But today, they got me.</p>
<p>First of all, sometime in the last few months, Gmail version 2 starting working in Opera.  It&#8217;s frustrating enough that Google rarely support Opera, but in this case, by shooting Gmail the ?nobrowsercheck query string, things were functioning.  In the last few weeks, though, that ceased working after about 5 minutes.  Things would get stuck on &#8220;Still loading&#8230;&#8221; and I&#8217;d have to revert to the &#8220;old version.&#8221;  Easy enough, albeit frustrating losing my &#8220;Quick Links.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also noticed that the Flashblock component I have installed works so aggressively that about 50% of the time, I can&#8217;t actually properly authorize Flash I want to play.  I will sit there clicking on the &#8220;Play&#8221; button over and over to no avail.  This one has annoyed me time and again.</p>
<p>Somehow, over the last 30 days, something happened that made Opera crash on a semi-daily basis.  At least twice a week, I get the Vista grey-out &#8220;This application is no longer responsive.  Would you like to Close the App and check online for a solution, or just close the app?&#8221; Yeah, thanks.  Except, it&#8217;s just Opera that&#8217;s been doing this.</p>
<div id="attachment_779" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 301px"><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/08/firefox-3.jpg" rel='lytebox[like-an-old-shoe]'><img class="size-medium wp-image-779" title="firefox-3" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/08/firefox-3-291x300.jpg" alt="I'm Back on Firefox" style="width:250px;" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Firefox: Like an old shoe</p></div>
<p>As a web developer, this was maybe the killer item for me: for the last month, the &#8220;View Source&#8221; menu on any web page doesn&#8217;t work, or if it does, it&#8217;s once in 50 tries.  I&#8217;ve adjusted the &#8220;view source&#8221; menu to point to the built in viewer, <a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/programmers-notepad/">Programmer&#8217;s Notepad</a>, and Windows Notepad.  None work.  Most of the time, I simply have to open Firefox.</p>
<p>Therefore, I find myself, today, back on Firefox. Like an old shoe, it just fits.  Once I slapped on the <a href="http://www.altmusictv.com/camifox/">CamiFox theme</a>, I felt right at home.  I imported my Opera bookmarks, updated my extensions, and it was very nice.  Now I have a very capable Javascript console, Firebug, Stylish, and a host of other useful tools at my fingers.  I&#8217;m very happy here 5 hours into the day and feeling comfortable with the choice.  Yes, I&#8217;m still pissed that I can&#8217;t style my RSS, but then, I haven&#8217;t gotten around to tinkering with that via Wordpress anyway.  I&#8217;ll let you know how life in Firefox 3 turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/like-an-old-shoe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pidgin Pulls a Firefox</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 08:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pidgin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading endless reports about the controversy over the non-resizable chat window in Pidgin, I decided to upgrade to see what all the hub-bub was about.  Suffice it to say that the new builds of Pidgin are pretty much unusable for me.  The typing portion is now only two rows high and cannot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading endless reports about the <a href="http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/4986">controversy over the non-resizable chat window in Pidgin</a>, I decided to upgrade to see what all the hub-bub was about.  Suffice it to say that the new builds of Pidgin are pretty much unusable for me.  The typing portion is now only two rows high and cannot be resized unless you fill it with more text.  The gist of the argument is that the code already exists, but the developers chose to remove it and then stuck by their decision, despite <b>a lot</b> of user feedback protesting.  </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/pidgin_medium.jpg" title="Pidgin Can No Longer Be Manually Resized" rel='lytebox[Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox]'><img src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/pidgin_medium.jpg" style="border:0;width:400px;" /></a><br />
<small>Click the image for a larger version</small></p>
<p>The problem is, like some others, my text box is locked even smaller, at just TWO lines, like below.  The two lines are so small on the application canvas that it&#8217;s awkward &#8211; it <i>feels</i> wrong.  </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/pidgin_small.png" title="Pidgin Can No Longer Be Manually Resized" rel='lytebox[Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox]'><img src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/pidgin_small.png" style="border:0;width:300px;margin:0 auto;" /></a><br />
<small>Click the image for a larger version</small></p>
<p>Nothing frustrates me more than when open source developer&#8217;s forget that their users are important, and the few that take the time to communicate shouldn&#8217;t be brushed off and treated like they are unimportant.  <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/A-Final-Word-on-the-Firefox-Fiasco">The Mozilla Firefox developers did this to me before</a> and as a result, I stopped using their software.  The Pidgin devs are much worse in this case.  They can&#8217;t even justify their decision without looking foolish.  Score -1 to the Pidgin devs.  I&#8217;ve reverted to the Pidgin 2.3-series for the time being, but I&#8217;m actively searching for a replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Little About Code Names</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/A-Little-About-Code-Names/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/A-Little-About-Code-Names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/A-Little-About-Code-Names</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the internet, you&#8217;ll find a slew of geeks who refer to their projects by &#8220;code name.&#8221;  Realistically, this isn&#8217;t GI Joe, so there&#8217;s no real reason to need a code name for your projects, right? I&#8217;m here to argue that.  
Since I&#8217;m involved in several web endeavors, there is always a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout the internet, you&#8217;ll find a slew of geeks who refer to their projects by &#8220;code name.&#8221;  Realistically, this isn&#8217;t GI Joe, so there&#8217;s no real reason to need a <i>code name</i> for your projects, right? I&#8217;m here to argue that.  </p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m involved in several web endeavors, there is always a <b>lot</b> of development code on my computers.  When I start something like a <a href='http://firsttube.com'>firsttube.com</a> redesign or something much larger, like an <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> redesign, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to have a hundred folders called &#8220;osnewsv4&#8243; or somesuch littered about.  I used to date the folders, but osnewsv4-tuesday doesn&#8217;t help.  And something like osnewsv4-20071017 doesn&#8217;t help much either.  </p>
<p>Now it gets even more complex: what if I build something and then decide to approach it differently? How will I know which folder is the one that contains relevant code? Enter codenames! </p>
<p>When I knew I was going to build a brand spankin&#8217; new version of OSNews, I knew it would eventually be called version 4, so it made no sense to start calling the first code off my fingers &#8220;v4.&#8221;  As it turns out, there were actually almost 10 versions of &#8220;<a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/OSNews">OSNews</a> version 4&#8243; before we accepted a codebase.  The first ones were much different in both look and feel and code.  So, for my own organizational purposes, I use code names.  All that matters is which code base eventually gets promoted to the &#8220;version 4&#8243; title.  </p>
<p>So, here a list of the codenames I&#8217;ve used on my projects in the past, going back as far as I can remember:</p>
<p>I used to maintain an open source weblog called <a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/Flip">Flip</a>, which later become <a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/smallaxe">Small Axe</a>.  Although Flip 2.0 may have had a codename, I can&#8217;t remember or find any reference to it.  Flip 2.1 was called Lobster.  Flip 2.2 was called Shark, although I never released that code, largely because before I finished it, I released Flip 3.0, Turtle.  Flip 3.1 was to be called Jackrabbit, but again, I never released it.  Flip 4.0 earned the codename Blueberry, but it was merged into the first release of Small Axe.  We&#8217;ll get back to Small Axe in a minute.  The nicknames of Flip were entirely random, they meant nothing, except that I wanted the 2.x and 3.x family to be animals, and for 4.x, a complete rewrite, I decided to use fruits.  That never materialized.   </p>
<p>A large part of why verison of Flip went entirely unreleased is because the app became big and tough to handle.  As a result, I stripped out the core of it and released &#8220;Flip Lite,&#8221; which was called &#8220;Red Squirrel.&#8221;  There was a running joke in college about a &#8220;blue raccoon,&#8221; so &#8220;red squirrel&#8221; was a silent tribute.  When Flip Lite 2 came about, it was called &#8220;Rivet Boy.&#8221;  <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/Rivet-Boy">Here&#8217;s why I called it &#8220;rivet boy&#8221;</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/blog">Small Axe Weblog</a> took over where Flip left off &#8211; I really need to get around to updating it, since I&#8217;ve probably worked up to v 0.7 by now! &#8211; but the roadmap, along with the <a href="http://smallaxesolutions.com/WeblogRoadmap.html">codenames, are listed here</a>.  They are codenamed after the japanese Iron Chefs and their popular guests.  </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/meta">firsttube.com</a> itself had codenames, some of the time.  <a href='http://firsttube.com'>firsttube.com</a> 3 was &#8220;Milky&#8221;.  3.1 was Crossbow because it was built to be cross-platform.  3.2 was Scoop Face, because it was inspired by <a href="http://scoop.kuro5hin.org">Scoop</a>.  3.3 was &#8220;Semi-Scoop&#8221;, much for the same reasons.  3.3.1 was &#8220;Flip&#8221;, because it was the first version to use code from the Flip project.  4.0 was lazily called &#8220;Lobster&#8221; because it was running Flip 2.1.  5.0 was &#8220;Linkfarm&#8221;, because it was &#8211; for the few weeks it lived &#8211; a link farm.  6.0 may or may not have actually had a codename when I built it, but it was listed in one directory as, &#8220;Wikitube&#8221;, because it ran phpwiki software.  I merged it and my weblog for version 7.0, which, along with 8.0, didn&#8217;t earn codenames.  The recently released <a href='http://firsttube.com'>firsttube.com</a> 9.0 was called &#8220;Chalkboard,&#8221; because at one point, I thought the header looked like a chalkboard.  Obviously, it doesn&#8217;t anymore.  </p>
<p>On to OSNews: Again, these codenames are mine and mine only, they are neither &#8220;official,&#8221; nor even known the rest of the staff, as it was only as I was developing code that I used the codenames.  The now defunct <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> Meta Blog is actually Small Axe, so it was in a folder called &#8220;Small Axe.&#8221;  We renamed it &#8220;meta blog&#8221; literally days before making it live.   </p>
<p><a href="http://osnews.com/staff">The <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> Staff Blog</a> used to be called <i>ftblogroller</i>, and I actually still have the very first working version on my company&#8217;s intranet test server.  The funny thing is, <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/firsttube.com-7.0-Last-Post-of-2005">I chronicled it long ago on firsttube.com</a>.  That was the engine of the <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> Staff Blog.  It also powers the <a href="http://osgalaxy.com">OSGalaxy</a> site, although there I refer to it as &#8220;Galaxy,&#8221; I never actually got around to packaging it.  </p>
<p><a href="http://jobs.osnews.com">Jobs.OSNews</a>, an experiment that everyone liked but nobody used, was called Meadow, only because it was green.  </p>
<p>OSNews v4 had a few codenames on my computer.  &#8220;NEW&#8221; was one of them, as was &#8220;TCO,&#8221; which was an acronym for &#8220;three column OSNews.&#8221;  The one that eventually earned the title version 4 was Blueprint, because I threw everything away and literally started from scratch.  Even the queries that fetch data were rewritten to be most efficient.  </p>
<p>Two projects in the words: &#8220;Timber&#8221; is the codename of a module that does <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> native polling.  Why Timber? A poll takes a <i>tally</i>, tally like <i>tally ho</i>, like <i>timber ho!</i>.  I didn&#8217;t say they made sense or were funny, I just said I used them.</p>
<p><img src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/mcbragg.jpg" align="left" style="border:0;" />Another project that has had several lives already is the iPhone optimized <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> site.  I have gone through several versions of this code as well.  Recently, I tossed aside &#8220;iui-osnews&#8221; and &#8220;knox&#8221; to really work on project &#8220;McBragg.&#8221;  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commander_McBragg">Commander McBragg</a> was the general in the Underdog cartoons.  I seemed to remember him going on several <i>safari</i>s, so I stole his name for my code.  McBragg&#8217;s javascript framework and CSS is not finished yet, but the underlying PHP appears to be sound, so I expect to finish that within the next few weeks.  </p>
<p>As you can see, having codenames can help a develper understand what code he&#8217;s looking at.  It would not help me at all to see a folder called &#8220;firsttube.com-20060722&#8243; because I wouldn&#8217;t know what version of <a href='http://firsttube.com'>firsttube.com</a> or whether the code was even used on the live site.  But certainly, if I saw a subfolder in my <a href='http://osnews.com'>OSNews</a> directory called &#8220;mcbragg,&#8221; I&#8217;d know it has relevent code.  I think there&#8217;s something to be said for categorizing your code that way, plus, it&#8217;s kinda cool to have codenames.  Yeah, I said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/A-Little-About-Code-Names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Idea for an Application</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/An-Idea-for-an-Application/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/An-Idea-for-an-Application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/An-Idea-for-an-Application</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an idea for an application I think could be really cool.  Ideally, it would be Mac-based, since I exclusively use Macs at home, but it could exist just the same on Windows or Linux or any other platform.  The problem is, I&#8217;m not a programmer &#8211; at least I can&#8217;t build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an idea for an application I think could be really cool.  Ideally, it would be Mac-based, since I exclusively use Macs at home, but it could exist just the same on Windows or Linux or any other platform.  The problem is, I&#8217;m not a programmer &#8211; at least I can&#8217;t build native apps, only web ones.  </p>
<p>So my question is, <i.what should I do about it</i>? Should I post it here? Submit it to OSNews? I&#8217;ve contacted the developers of <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/">MarsEdit</a>, because that&#8217;s the closest thing that exists to my idea, but he opted out without hearing the idea, so I&#8217;m kind of at a loss.  What should one do if they have an idea for a potentially useful application?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/An-Idea-for-an-Application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Release-Tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Release-Tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Release-Tuesday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week has already seen a slew of releases: first came an updated Airport Express (I want one).  Then today, Apple unleased Safari 3.1, which vastly extends support for bleeding edge web standards like CSS3, HTML5, and expands support of ECMAscript.  
Finally, not to have all headlines stolen this St. Patrick&#8217;s Day, Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week has already seen a slew of releases: first came an updated <a href="http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/">Airport Express</a> (I want one).  Then today, Apple unleased <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari 3.1</a>, which vastly extends support for bleeding edge web standards like CSS3, HTML5, and expands support of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript">ECMAscript</a>.  </p>
<p>Finally, not to have all headlines stolen this St. Patrick&#8217;s Day, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/Browse.aspx?DisplayLang=en&#038;nr=20&#038;productId=38DF6AB1-13D4-409C-966D-CBE61F040027&#038;sortCriteria=date">Microsoft loosed Vista SP1</a> to Windows Update.  </p>
<p>I have installed Safari 3.1/Win and this evening I will upgrade at home on the Mac.  I am currently downloading Vista SP1 for my work PC.  Reviews to follow, for certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Release-Tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Releases Lotus Symphony Beta</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/ibm-releases-lotus-symphony-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/ibm-releases-lotus-symphony-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/IBM-Releases-Lotus-Symphony-Beta</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine everyone&#8217;s surprise this morning when IBM not only announces that they are working on an office suite package, Lotus Symphony, but that it&#8217;s geared towards consumers, not businesses, and it&#8217;s based on OpenOffice.org, and&#8230; oh yeah&#8230; the beta is available immediately! 
BetaNews caught my attention this morning, and it looked nice, so I downloaded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine everyone&#8217;s surprise this morning when IBM not only announces that they are working on an office suite package, <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.jspa">Lotus Symphony</a>, but that it&#8217;s geared towards consumers, not businesses, and it&#8217;s based on OpenOffice.org, and&#8230; oh yeah&#8230; the beta is available <b>immediately</b>! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/IBM_Revives_Lotus_Symphony_Supports_ODF_Format/1190155387">BetaNews</a> caught my attention this morning, and it looked nice, so I downloaded it and took it for a spin.  </p>
<p>Lo and behold, this suite is the best OpenOffice.org offshoot I&#8217;ve used thus far.  StarOffice and Openoffice.org are both nice products, but the layout and graphical tweaking done on Lotus Symphony is just great.  </p>
<p>First of all, the beautiful blue rounded tabs of each document make for a warm, modern, and welcome theme.  The formatting controls on the right hand side are smartly available like Office 2007&#8217;s &#8220;ribbon&#8221;, Also, the buttons are attractive and easily decipherable and the best part is that I can actually find what I&#8217;m looking for.  I&#8217;ve been using Office 2007 for a few months now, and my biggest pet peeve in Word is that I often highlight text as I read it and a floating formatting box pops up, often causing my to mistakenly format the text I&#8217;m reading.  Symphony doesn&#8217;t have that problem.  </p>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/lotus1.jpg" title="Lotus Symphony" rel='lytebox[ibm-releases-lotus-symphony-beta]'><img src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/lotus1tn.jpg" alt="Lotus Symphony" /></a><br />
<small>Click thumbnail for a full screen</small></p>
<p>As far as compatibility goes, I tried opening several Word documents, some complex with embedded images, Word Art, formulas, tables, forms, protection, and more, and it handled all of them properly, often with only minor format tweaks if any at all.  It would not read my Office 2007 .docx files.  It did easily import some complex Excel files without flinching.  </p>
<p>It imported all of my Open Document formatted documents perfectly, as expected.  </p>
<p>As far as Powerpoint compatibility goes, it properly formatted a templated, fairly hairy presentation, but the tools to manipulate presentations were not immediately understandable, so the Presentation interface manipulation portion of Symphony needs some tinkering for certain.  </p>
<p>The only weird choice, one I&#8217;m very confused about, is their decision to move *back* to a single window frame.  StafOffice 6 used this &#8220;desktop&#8221; view to encapsulate all of its components, and that was done away with for OpenOffice.org 1.0.  Oddly, now that tabbed-interfaces are all the rage, Symphony makes the single window usable again.  I&#8217;m actually pretty jazzed to see this paradigm begin to work.  It is much better executed now than it was with previous versions of Star Office.  </p>
<p>Other than that, Lotus Symphony is a really beautiful start to a free office suite.  I cannot imagine ever wanting to go back to OpenOffice.org after using this program as an alternative.  That said, I hope they bring me my Mac version soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/ibm-releases-lotus-symphony-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac Freeware RSS via Yahoo Pipes</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Mac-Freeware-RSS-via-Yahoo-Pipes/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Mac-Freeware-RSS-via-Yahoo-Pipes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Pipes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Mac-Freeware-RSS-via-Yahoo-Pipes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wanted to view all of the MacUpdate universal binary apps, but limit it only to freeware? MacUpdate doesn&#8217;t offer such a feed, but thanks to the incredible Yahoo Pipes, I was able to make the feed myself.  I love that site, it&#8217;s really amazing. 
http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=6tbRfrJd3BG887G96UjTQA&#038;_render=rss 
Enjoy.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wanted to view all of the MacUpdate universal binary apps, but limit it only to <i>freeware</i>? MacUpdate doesn&#8217;t offer such a feed, but thanks to the incredible <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com">Yahoo Pipes</a>, I was able to make the feed myself.  I love that site, it&#8217;s really amazing. </p>
<p><a href="http://://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=6tbRfrJd3BG887G96UjTQA&#038;_render=rss">http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=6tbRfrJd3BG887G96UjTQA&#038;_render=rss</a> </p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Mac-Freeware-RSS-via-Yahoo-Pipes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Faith in Google Is Now In Question</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/My-Faith-in-Google-Is-Now-In-Question/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/My-Faith-in-Google-Is-Now-In-Question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PicasaWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/My-Faith-in-Google-Is-Now-In-Question</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As my readers will know, I&#8217;ve detailed my isses with Google, or more specifically, Picasa Web in the past.  Well, today, I was surprised when Picasa refused to upload new photos for me.  I cannot use my iPhoto exporter anymore, since that broke with one of the last two updates to iPhoto, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my readers will know, I&#8217;ve detailed <a href="http://firsttube.com/tag/picasaweb">my isses with Google, or more specifically, Picasa Web</a> in the past.  Well, today, I was surprised when Picasa refused to upload new photos for me.  I cannot use my iPhoto exporter anymore, since that broke with one of the last two updates to iPhoto, so I tried the web interface and then the &#8220;Picasa Web Albums Uploader&#8221; application Google provides.  The reason it failed? No storage.  </p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s odd,&#8221; I thought.  I have extended storage and about 5 GB free.  But alas, it expired.  In fact, my storage SHOULD have expired in August, but just did recently.  So I tried to upgrade again. After all, Google&#8217;s been good to me on the whole.  But my order was cancelled by Google.  The reason: &#8220;<i>Another order modified the user&#8217;s storage plan before this order was received</i>&#8220;</p>
<p>What the heck? So I tried again.  And once again: cancelled.  So my storage has been cancelled for a few days now, no upgrade has been applied, no warning whatsoever from Google (at my account, which is a Gmail account!), and no way to upgrade! </p>
<p>Gmail has been a <b>fantastic</b> app for me, but I&#8217;m just not sure about extended Google services.  I&#8217;ve heard way too many nightmare stories about people having stuff cancelled and there is just no recourse: Google provides no support, no assistance, no real time communication, nothing other than crappy, slow-to-respond Google groups from very unofficial people.  </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s storage engine has been modified heavily lately, and this does not bode well.  If it can expire without notice &#8211; will they delete my stuff? How long will they hold it, being as though I can&#8217;t upgrade? If Google deletes even one bit of my stuff, I am through with PicasaWeb and Google&#8217;s expanded storage for good.</p>
<p>Boo Google! Boo! It may be time migrate to <a href="http://smugmug.com">smugmug</a>, <a href="http://zoto.com">Zoto</a>, or <a href="http://zooomr.com">zooomr.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/My-Faith-in-Google-Is-Now-In-Question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Video and Thoughts on Gmail</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Gmail-Video-and-Thoughts-on-Gmail/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Gmail-Video-and-Thoughts-on-Gmail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Gmail-Video-and-Thoughts-on-Gmail</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google just released their Gmail compilation video to YouTube, and&#8230; well&#8230; it&#8217;s cool! It really is.  Not only because the video is fun, not only because it&#8217;s refreshing to see a company that looks like it might be fun and not just a bunch of hair old white men who are only concerned with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google just released their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKAInP_tmHk">Gmail compilation video</a> to YouTube, and&#8230; well&#8230; it&#8217;s cool! It really is.  Not only because the video is fun, not only because it&#8217;s refreshing to see a company that looks like it might be fun and not just a bunch of hair old white men who are only concerned with the bottom line, but also because it fascinates me.  It fascinates me that a product can inspire such loyalty that makes its users so fiercely dedicated to it. </p>
<p>I am blindly loyal to Mac OS X and Gmail.  The both of them are huge inspirations to me; they make me productive, I enjoy using them, they work with me and for me rather than as an abrasive but necessary intermediary (like Citrix) or flat out against me (Microsoft Word!) Gmail is so great and so empowering that random people are willing to take time to make ads for it.  </p>
<p>I wish I could be that happy with, partnered with, and loyal to all vendors I patronize.  Now, <i>that&#8217;s</i> delivering a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Gmail-Video-and-Thoughts-on-Gmail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iLife &#8216;08 First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/iLife-08-First-Impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/iLife-08-First-Impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/iLife-08-First-Impressions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, being a loyal Mac user, I rushed out and got iLife &#8216;08.  iLife &#8216;08 was billed as a huge update.  I was very excited.  I got a chance to play with some of the apps, and here is my first impression. 
iPhoto: Features Galore
iPhoto and iTunes have always been the two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, being a loyal Mac user, I rushed out and got iLife &#8216;08.  iLife &#8216;08 was billed as a huge update.  I was very excited.  I got a chance to play with some of the apps, and here is my first impression. </p>
<p><b>iPhoto: Features Galore</b><br />
iPhoto and iTunes have always been the two core apps for me on the Mac, since I use both loyally.  iTunes is no longer billed as part of iLife, but iPhoto received a huge makeover for version 7, so I was especially excited for this application.  </p>
<p>Lo and behold, iPhoto &#8216;08 is worth the price of admission.  This version includes some really neat features, some advanced photo editing I was pleased to use.  The addition of &#8220;events&#8221; was a very welcome feature.  iPhoto attempts to &#8220;autosplit&#8221; events when it first loads and the auto-split mostly sucks.  So my advice is add your <b>entire</b> library into one &#8220;misc&#8221; event (which can take several seconds) and then pull out the ones you want elsewhere.  Moving from one event to another is painful.  You can join and split <i>very easily</i>, but moving a nonsequential photo into a previous event is still a multi-step process (split, split, &#8220;all&#8221;, merge).  </p>
<p>The &#8220;skimming&#8221; feature is one of the coolest, most unique things I&#8217;ve seen in some time.  It&#8217;s surprisingly easy to use, very impressive to onlookers, and actually pretty useful.  iPhoto 08 is a great step forward and I am very happy with it thus far.  Just one warning: it will warn you every time you move photos from one event to another.  Leave the warning.  After 2 hours of work, I accidentally remerged ALL photos into one event, and had to repeat the entire process. Yuck! </p>
<p><b>iWeb &#8216;08: Incremental at Best</b><br />
iWeb &#8216;08 is a garbage upgrade.  I really thought that based on Steve Jobs&#8217; keynote we were going to see something special.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s mostly the same iWeb with a few weird features.  Adding HTML snippets is great, but adding a Google Map or Google Adsense is too specialized and most people don&#8217;t put Adsense on their personal sites anyway (snicker!).  The export to a &#8220;personal domain&#8221; took me to mac.com and told me that my .Mac trial had ended.  I haven&#8217;t done too much research, but does this mean your domain must be hosted at mac.com? I don&#8217;t know why I can&#8217;t export to an FTP server.  The other &#8220;features&#8221; added are nonsense.  There are still major problems: no way to style the navigation, no CSS, no &#8220;apply style to all pages&#8221; and no &#8220;convert to web friendly fonts.&#8221;  iWeb templates can be VERY image heavy, and that would be a nice touch.</p>
<p><b>Rounding it Out</b><br />
I haven&#8217;t had a chance to play with iMovie or iDVD yet, but I&#8217;ll be visiting them shortly.  Garageband Magic looks kinda cool; I only played with it for a few minutes, but it&#8217;s a nice front to an otherwise intimidating application.  </p>
<p><b>Some Suggestions for iLife</b><br />
I am very upset that the &#8220;web galleries&#8221; cannot be exported to a folder the way iWeb can.  I just paid $79 for a photo manager, and one of its coolest features is unavailable without buying your &#8220;still a ripoff&#8221; .Mac plan for $99 annually.  By the way, Google charges me $20 a year, and I use their web apps about 100 times as much as i would use .Mac.   </p>
<p>We really need &#8220;iVideo.&#8221;  I recognize that both iPhoto and iTunes can manage video clips, but I prefer to keep my videos away from my massive music collection and out of my photos.  </p>
<p>iWeb needs a major overhaul to include some basic features.  The ability to manipulate the navigation menu is critical, without it, it&#8217;s just for silly personal sites and not much more.  While it&#8217;s very easy, the two year old and now free &#8220;SiteStudio&#8221; makes it easier to create websites even faster, writes with stylesheets, and can FTP to my personal site.  Here&#8217;s my equasion: Adobe Pagemaker is to iWeb as Microsoft Word is to X.  That&#8217;s what you&#8217;re missing &#8211; X, a simple tool for simple lightweight website creation. </p>
<p><b>Overall</b><br />
If you&#8217;re using iPhoto heavily, I think iLife is worth it.  It&#8217;s really great to get small-step upgrades to your other apps too, even if they are minor like iWeb&#8217;s.  If you are only a casual iLife user, definitely wait until you get a new Mac.  There is nothing so groundbreaking that it&#8217;s a must have, and the old apps are still perfectly capable of getting the job done properly.  I suppose we&#8217;ll have to wait until Leopard and the inevitable round of &#8216;08 .1 updates to see how well they can make this thing work, but for now, at only $79, it&#8217;s a solid upgrade well worth the comparably low price for people who use iLife with regularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/iLife-08-First-Impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Regrets</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/No-Regrets/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/No-Regrets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/No-Regrets</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I moved to Opera browser on Windows sometime ago, and I have no regrets.  Apparently, most Opera users agree.  
Nothing feels as perfect as Camino on my Mac, but it&#8217;s seriously lacking in the developer department.  No javascript console, no web developer tools, no draggable tabs.  Hopefully by 2.0 this will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved to Opera browser on Windows sometime ago, and I have no regrets.  Apparently, <a href="http://operawatch.com/news/2007/04/research-finds-opera-users-are-most-satisfied.html">most Opera users agree</a>.  </p>
<p>Nothing feels as perfect as Camino on my Mac, but it&#8217;s seriously lacking in the developer department.  No javascript console, no web developer tools, no draggable tabs.  Hopefully by 2.0 this will be ironed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/No-Regrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did I Call This or What??</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Did-I-Call-This-or-What/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Did-I-Call-This-or-What/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Did-I-Call-This-or-What</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might suggest that I was writing about something that isn&#8217;t a very far fetched suggestion, but I think I was writing about something I had not seen suggested elsewhere ever when I said that Apple should release Safari for Windows.  And then today, Mary Jo Foley, former Microsoft Watch columnist, suggests that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might suggest that I was writing about something that isn&#8217;t a very far fetched suggestion, but I think I was writing about something I had not seen suggested elsewhere ever when I said that <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/A-Suggestion-for-Apple-in-2007">Apple should release Safari for Windows</a>.  And then today, Mary Jo Foley, former <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/">Microsoft Watch</a> columnist, suggests that <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=197">the Mozilla Foundation seems to believe that Safari for Windows is coming</a>.  </p>
<p>If Apple ports <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocoa_(API)">Cocoa</a> to Windows (like they obviously have done with at least a subset of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_(API)">Carbon</a> in order to run Quicktime and iTunes), they can introduce all sorts of Mac software for Windows which could very keenly familiarize Windows users with the Mac experience to help lure potential switchers, people who might be close to considering a new computer and having to face a learning curve with Vista anyway.  </p>
<p>In other words, this is great news.  I&#8217;m firmly on Opera right now, but if Safari for Windows came out, you never know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Did-I-Call-This-or-What/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Three: Enter Opera</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Take-Three-Enter-Opera/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Take-Three-Enter-Opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory Leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XUL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Take-Three-Enter-Opera</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using Flock was kind of a long shot.  Flock is based on Gecko, like Firefox, which has given me a lot of problems.  Flock served me well at first, but then starting gobbling up RAM.  So, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve narrowed it down, for me, to XUL and extensions.  
I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using <a href="http://flock.com">Flock</a> was kind of a long shot.  Flock is based on Gecko, like Firefox, which has given me <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/Youre-Killing-Me-Firefox">a lot</a> of <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/More-on-Firefox">problems</a>.  Flock served me well at first, but then starting <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/Darn-it-Something-Bigger-May-Be-Wrong-Here">gobbling up RAM</a>.  So, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve narrowed it down, for me, to XUL and extensions.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly what&#8217;s to blame for the specific problems I have: other programs on the computer? a single bad extension? I don&#8217;t know, but whatever it was, it was present in FF1.5, FF2, and Flock.  And each had their own set of extensions installed.  It&#8217;s not a core Gecko problem, because, as I showed before, <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/A-Final-Word-on-the-Firefox-Fiasco">Camino doesn&#8217;t have the same problem</a>. </p>
<p>So, at the urging of <a href="http://rootography.com">Nate</a>, who, I guess, also spends some time <a href="http://achfoo.deviantart.com">at his computer</a>, I decided to go for a full time ride at <a href="http://opera.com">Opera</a>.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t require THAT much from a computer: mainly, it has to be able to sustain my browser requirements.  And those are tough, because I expect to be able to open 10-15 tabs and still have the browser function without (a) eating up greater than 200MB of RAM, (2) eating up > 10% of the CPU for more than a few seconds, and (third) locking up the browser or worse, the entire system.  Enough use of Gmail, Flickr, or other AJAX apps and my Windows Gecko/XUL browsers toast themselves and everything around them.  So I&#8217;m giving Opera a go. </p>
<p>The only crappy thing is that there&#8217;s no way to import form cookies, form history, cookie block list, ad-block filters, or history.  And that sucks, because it&#8217;s going to take me a long time to rebuild that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Take-Three-Enter-Opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
