<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>firsttube.com &#187; RIAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firsttube.com/tag/riaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firsttube.com</link>
	<description>crunchy nuggets, served semi-daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://firsttube.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Madonna Gives the Music Industry the Finger</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/Madonna-Gives-the-Music-Industry-the-Finger/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/Madonna-Gives-the-Music-Industry-the-Finger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiohead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Madonna-Gives-the-Music-Industry-the-Finger</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The time draws nigh, my friends.  Madonna dumped Warner, her record label of more than 20 years in favor of a deal with Live Nation, who will promote her concerts and release her albums.  Last month, Radiohead announced a &#8220;name-your-price&#8221; download option for their new album.  Amazon.com now offers DRM free MP3 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The time draws nigh, my friends.  <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/music/madonna-dumps-label-in-134m-deal/2007/10/11/1191696045334.html">Madonna dumped Warner, her record label of more than 20 years</a> in favor of a deal with Live Nation, who will promote her concerts and release her albums.  Last month, <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/09/radioheads-new-downl.html">Radiohead announced a &#8220;name-your-price&#8221; download option</a> for their new album.  <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/09/25/amazon-mp3-drm-free-downloads-from-amazon/">Amazon.com now offers DRM free MP3 downloads</a>, and even Apple, the creators and maintainers of the world&#8217;s most common DRM, have rolled out <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/05/30itunesplus.html">iTunes Plus, which is DRM-free</a>. </p>
<p>The record industry is crumbling, as it should, and music is slowly coming back around.  If artists make only a few cents per recording, why wouldn&#8217;t they prefer to charge 25 cents a song and take home almost 100% of that? If &#8220;internet piracy&#8221; is such a problem, why not reward the true artists who can compel us to see them live, buy their merchandise, etc? </p>
<p>Yes, the days of DRM, the RIAA, in fact <b>all</b> record labels are drawing to a close.  Mark my words: the music landscape will be dramatically different in a decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/Madonna-Gives-the-Music-Industry-the-Finger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From AllOfMP3</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/what-we-learned-from-allofmp3/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/what-we-learned-from-allofmp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AllOfMP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/What-We-Learned-From-AllOfMP3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading an article on The Reg  that claims that the Danes have blocked access to AllOfMP3.com, I decided to spout off a bit about this.  The RIAA and record labels need to wake the heck up and listen to consumers.  And they are speaking VERY loudly.  Continued&#8230;

I will no longer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/26/itnueski_banned/">an article on The Reg</a>  that claims that the Danes have blocked access to <a href="http://allofmp3.com">AllOfMP3.com</a>, I decided to spout off a bit about this.  The RIAA and record labels need to wake the heck up and listen to consumers.  And they are speaking VERY loudly.  Continued&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-293"></span><br />
I will no longer tolerate digital rights management that includes copy protection.  I will not purchase a song in a DRM&#8217;ed file format.  I will not play this game, period.  </p>
<p>But why is AllOfMP3 so popular? It&#8217;s not just because its non-DRM files &#8211; it&#8217;s also because it&#8217;s the right price.  Some people out there believe that 99 cents is a good price for a song.  They buy from iTunes.  Maybe 99 cents is a good price, but not for a DRM&#8217;ed file it&#8217;s not.  </p>
<p>Others buy in droves from AllOfMP3.  They pay 2 cents a megabyte, which is much fairer &#8211; short songs are cheap and long songs are more expensive.  But I submit that if AllOfMP3 DOUBLED their prices, their business would not change in a significant way.  I submit that if they TRIPLED the price, it still wouldn&#8217;t be majorly effected.  See, paying a dime for a song is great, but I&#8217;d gladly pay a quarter or even 40 cents without blinking.  There&#8217;s a value associated with these things, and people know this.  Furthermore, people are WILLING and, often, even WANT to buy and own something legitimately if it&#8217;s the right price.  But when they are overcharged, or with DRM&#8217;ed file, sold an inferior or limited product, they feel cheated, and begin to rationalize stealing in a Robin Hood fashion.  </p>
<p>If DRM&#8217;ed songs were legit and 10 cents a piece, I probably wouldn&#8217;t buy them, but MANY MANY more people would, and MANY MANY more tracks would be sold to the same customers who buy now.  If they were 40 cents, you&#8217;d probably see another appreciable growth.  </p>
<p>My point here is that 99 cents is too much for a restricted digital file containing one song.  There are two major flaws to the product &#8211; it&#8217;s overpriced and it&#8217;s limited in use.  Fix one of the two and you&#8217;ll see your market explode.  But go the opposite way &#8211; higher prices and more restrictive DRM &#8211; as things seem to be going, and you&#8217;ll watch your increasingly savvy market come up with more inventive ways to get their music.  AllOfMP3 is just the beginning.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/what-we-learned-from-allofmp3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
