<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>firsttube.com &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firsttube.com/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firsttube.com</link>
	<description>crunchy nuggets, served semi-daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://firsttube.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Classic Tab</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/classic-tab/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/classic-tab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trey Anastasio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who thinks it looks and sounds like #Trey is having more fun with Classic TAB than with #Phish?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks it looks and sounds like <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23Trey">#Trey</a> is having more fun with Classic TAB than with <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23Phish">#Phish</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/classic-tab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragon Dictation</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/dragon-dictation/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/dragon-dictation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dragon Dictation for the iPhone is spectacular.  It works so well it constantly amazes me.  Even when I dictated my wife&#8217;s name &#8211; Jenn &#8211; it suggested &#8220;Jenn&#8221; as a possible alternative for &#8220;Jen.&#8221;  It frequently gets what I say right the first time, and often catches the wrong words in the tap-to-correct mode when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: right; padding: 5px;" title="dragon dictation" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2010/02/dragon-dictation.jpg" alt="" height="250" />Dragon Dictation for the iPhone is spectacular.  It works so well it constantly amazes me.  Even when I dictated my wife&#8217;s name &#8211; Jenn &#8211; it suggested &#8220;Jenn&#8221; as a possible alternative for &#8220;Jen.&#8221;  It frequently gets what I say right the first time, and often catches the wrong words in the tap-to-correct mode when it makes a mistake.</p>
<p>So I decided to sing into it and give it a run for its money.  I was singing Trey Anastasio&#8217;s &#8220;Host Across the Potomac,&#8221; whose chorus is &#8220;<em>The time has come for desks and chairs to be elevated.</em>&#8220;  I sang the line several times, annunciating a bit more with each line, and here are the results:</p>
<ul>
<li>The time has come for desk send JS to be a little David</li>
<li>The time has come by best chance to be added day babe</li>
<li>The time has come for dad send chance to be added day again</li>
<li>The time has come for desk and chairs to be inundated</li>
</ul>
<p>Gotta love it; four times sung, four totally different results.</p>
<p>The moral of the story is: Dragon is great for dictation, but not so much for transcribing singing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/dragon-dictation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My iTunes Library</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/my-itunes-library/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/my-itunes-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prompted by Eugenia&#8217;s post about her iTunes library, I decided to post a glimpse of my own library.  My library is still awaiting a massive import of my CDs, which will add several thousand songs.  Here are the vitals:
5406 tracks, 29.18 GB on disk, 17 days
Only 2699 have something in the &#8220;play count&#8221; field. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prompted by <a href="http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2010/01/15/breakdown-of-my-itunes-library/">Eugenia&#8217;s post about her iTunes library</a>, I decided to post a glimpse of my own library.  My library is still awaiting a massive import of my CDs, which will add several thousand songs.  Here are the vitals:</p>
<p><em>5406 tracks, 29.18 GB on disk, 17 days</em></p>
<p>Only 2699 have something in the &#8220;play count&#8221; field.   I&#8217;ve noticed that for whatever reason, it doesn&#8217;t register a play count unless you finish the song. Also, many of these were in an iTunes library on a previous PC. This library actually goes back until about 2000, was first in iTunes on Windows in approximately 2003, and was first moved to an iBook in 2005, and was finally rebuilt on my second Mac, a MacBook Pro in 1996.  Since then, it&#8217;s been ported to two different iMacs.)</p>
<p>Most played tracks:</p>
<p>1. “Shankhill Butchers” by The Decemberists (104)<br />
2. “Tennessee Jed” by The Grateful Dead (104)<br />
3. “Leslie Anne Levine” by The Decemberists (101)<br />
4. “Terrapin Station” by The Grateful Dead (100)<br />
5. “Circle” by Portal (99)</p>
<p>Most tracks by the same artist:<br />
1. Phish (442)<br />
2. The Decemberists (112)<br />
3. DMB (110)<br />
4. The Beatles (71)<br />
5. Pearl Jam (68)<br />
6. The Pat McGee Band (61)<br />
7. Guns N Roses (51)<br />
8. The Grateful Dead (48)</p>
<p>Oldest track added in iTunes library: 3059 tracks added on 4/11/06<br />
Newest track added: “Alaska” by Phish: 1/2/2010</p>
<p>Shortest track: “Wilkins Hyundai and Suburu” by Peter Griffin: 7 seconds<br />
Longest track: “35 Minute Jam” by Phish: 35:33 minutes</p>
<p>Lowest Bitrate: “It&#8217;s Gary Shandling&#8217;s Show” 19 kbps (mp3)<br />
Highest Bitrate: Several self-ripped WAV files at 1411 kbps (wav)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/my-itunes-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing Is Permanently Retired</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/nothing-is-permanently-retired/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/nothing-is-permanently-retired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At about one minute fifty-five seconds and without any jam, a fairly faithful replication of an album version of a song shouldn&#8217;t be a setlist standout.  But, by many accounts, the 12/31/09 offering of &#8220;Demand&#8221; is a notable and curious point in a long setlist.  It&#8217;s notable not because it was flawlessly performed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At about one minute fifty-five seconds and without any jam, a fairly faithful replication of an album version of a song shouldn&#8217;t be a setlist standout.  But, by many accounts, the 12/31/09 offering of &#8220;Demand&#8221; is a notable and curious point in a long setlist.  It&#8217;s notable not because it was flawlessly performed (although it was inarguably done justice), not because it contained inspired playing (but fun, sure), but rather, because it hasn&#8217;t been performed since November 1996, over 13 years ago.  Having been shelved for so long &#8211; and very likely to be stashed away again for some time &#8211; makes the performance special.  But why?  Why does it matter, why do we enjoy ourselves so much if Phish plays one of their rarer songs rather a well-jammed version of than one of their more common songs?</p>
<p>At heart, I&#8217;m a stats geek.  Maybe not like <a href="http://ihoz.com/PhishStats.html">Zzyzx</a>, but certainly I&#8217;m interested in the stats.  I&#8217;m incredibly interested in Phish setlist construction, and hope that one day I find myself in a situation where I can interview Trey about it.  &#8220;Why,&#8221; I would ask, &#8220;does a song like, say, <em>Camel Walk</em>, only appear every 50-some-odd shows? Is that intentional? Why premiere <em>Glide II</em> only to drop it seemingly forever?  Are there ever permanently retired songs, like, perhaps, <em>No Dogs Allowed</em>, <em>Dear Mrs Reagan</em>, and <em>Jennifer Dances</em>? Can we ever expect to see <em>Eliza</em> again?&#8221;  I would assume that, like most musicians, Phish collectively enjoys playing some songs more than others, but is that reflected in the setlist? If they don&#8217;t like a song, why would they play it at all&#8230; or write or perform it at all?  Maybe it&#8217;s <em>purposeful</em> that they &#8220;create&#8221; rarities?  I wonder, do they maybe love playing <em>Harpua</em>, but intentionally not overuse it so that its appearance heralds a special show?  Why not just unleash a hose of rarities during a tour knowing it would make fans very happy<sup><small>[1]</small></sup>?  Unless these some songs are purposely rarities?  Will <em>Alumni Blues</em> ever rejoin the setlist as anything other than a super-rarity?</p>
<p>What about common songs? Is Trey aware that AC/DC Bag has opened no fewer than <em>SIX</em> shows since November 1? Did Phish decide to showcase Kill Devil Falls more times than any other song off of <em>Joy</em> because they feel it&#8217;s the best song, or was that just coincidence? Are they purposely playing songs like Llama less frequently, or are they simply not remembering it during on-stage setlist construction?  Will <em>Time Turns Elastic</em> get its due, in time, when it is a rarity?</p>
<p><a style="float: left; padding: 5px;" title="View full size" href="http://phish.net/media/livepics/2009-12-04--graham-0001.jpg" target="_blank" rel='lytebox[nothing-is-permanently-retired]'><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kvu096iMIM1qa9vva.png" alt="" /></a>In the end, the whole debate is, at the same time, pointless and essential; it is, one on hand, irrelvent, and on the other, the heart of what makes Phish so interesting.  If they played rarities all the time, they wouldn&#8217;t be rarities and a large part of the fun of Phish shows might be lost.  But we all go to see them play, and even songs of which I&#8217;ve personally grown a bit tired, such as <em>Stash</em>, still manage to steal the set from time to time, most notably night one of Festival 8.  It&#8217;s not so much <strong>what</strong> they play as much as how they play it.  I&#8217;ve learned that even <em>Character Zero</em>, once you get past the lyrics, can be just as interesting a jam vehicle as Mike&#8217;s, YEM, Jim, or Bowie.  And yet, I&#8217;m still kind of hoping for a bust-out.  Despite that, certain songs &#8211; for me, Moma, for example &#8211; are a bit of a letdown, because I&#8217;d rather hear something else I like better.  I suppose if I have to hear a jam, I&#8217;d rather that jam stem from a song I&#8217;ve yet to hear live than a song I&#8217;ve heard 10+ times before.</p>
<p>When I look at the NYE setlist, I think the highlights, musically, were <em>Ghost, Rock and Roll</em>, and <em>Piper</em>, three fairly common songs.  I also think <em>Demand</em> was awesome (mostly given the infrequency of its appearance?), and <em>Swept</em> Away into the most uncommonly jammed <em>Steep</em> I&#8217;ve ever heard is a high point, largely because it was an especially unique performance.  So it&#8217;s a mix of both quality jams, song frequency, and performance uniqueness that made this fun.  A prior night of the run included <em>Gotta Jibboo &gt; Wilson -&gt; Gotta Jibboo</em>, again, two fairly common songs that provided a notable highlight as well.  It&#8217;s not just about rarities, that much is certain.</p>
<p>But why should we care about stats, right? What good are stats anyway? All they do, one might argue, is allow you to measure your own satisfaction comparatively, an expressly <strong>non</strong>-Phishy attitude.  What good is seeing <em>Buffalo Bill</em> or <em>Brother</em> if you don&#8217;t like those songs as much as, say, <em>Divided Sky</em> or <em>Possum </em>except that one can say they&#8217;ve seen a rare song?</p>
<p>I think the conclusion is that it&#8217;s a mix of all of that: great jams, cool people, uniqueness of an individual performance, and the fact that the setlist remains an unknown all provide a different dimension of interest, and it&#8217;s all of that that can make a Phish concert so fun.  It&#8217;s not about comparison to others&#8217; shows, but rather, a comparison to my own show history: a re-affirmation of the fact that I can keep seeing the same band without ever tiring of the process.  As much as I love the great jam, there&#8217;s still a moment in between songs when I&#8217;m jumping out of my seat with excitement that the <em>next</em> song could be something crazy.</p>
<p><small>[1] I realize that there were scores of rarities this tour, but I&#8217;m talking a total blow-out, something like &#8220;Set 1: <em>Brother, Alumni Blues, Dog Log, Glide, Anarchy, In a Hole, She Caught the Katy, Sparkle</em><sup><small>[2]</small></sup><em>, Have Mercy, Harpua &gt; Buffalo Bill</em>&#8220;.</small></p>
<p><small> [2] &#8230;Just seeing if you were paying attention.</small></p>
<p><em>This post originally appeared on <a href="http://blog.phish.net/post/319919991/anatomy-of-a-setlist">the phish.net blog</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/nothing-is-permanently-retired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phish Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/phish-wishlist/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/phish-wishlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the recent setlist madness, I decided to compile my Phish Wishlist.  Here are the 13 songs I most want to hear played live, in no particular order:
Destiny Unbound (36)
Camel Walk (50)
Brother (17)
Scents and Subtle Sounds (7)
A Song I Heard the Ocean Sing (11)
Dinner and a Movie (10)
Glide (8)
Harpua (23)
Spock&#8217;s Brain (64)
Have Mercy (141)
Walk Away [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given <a href="http://phish.net/tour/66">the recent setlist madness</a>, I decided to compile my Phish Wishlist.  Here are the 13 songs I most want to hear played live, in no particular order:</p>
<blockquote><p>Destiny Unbound (36)<br />
Camel Walk (50)<br />
Brother (17)<br />
Scents and Subtle Sounds (7)<br />
A Song I Heard the Ocean Sing (11)<br />
Dinner and a Movie (10)<br />
Glide (8)<br />
Harpua (23)<br />
Spock&#8217;s Brain (64)<br />
Have Mercy (141)<br />
Walk Away (21)<br />
The Lizards (4)<br />
Crowd Control (13)*</p></blockquote>
<p>The number following each song is the average show gap between performances since the debut.  As you can see, given the number of shows I currently attend each year and the number I expect to attend in the next few years, it&#8217;s increasingly unlikely that I will see&#8230; well&#8230; ANY of these songs live, ever.  With each passing show, many of these number are increasing just a touch to the right of the decimal point, and the odds I actually see them go down inversely.  Even Lizards, which is still really low, is deceivingly so, given that it was so overplayed in the &#8220;old days&#8221; and underplayed these days.  In fact, <a href="http://ihoz.com/PhishStats.html">ZZYZX&#8217;s stats</a> say the odds of me not seeing Lizards in 35 shows is 0.0%.</p>
<p>I realize that with NYE being my only remaining show this year, any of these showing up is unlikely, because Phish has a history, for several years now, of not  going too crazy on NYE, but rather, doing that in the nights leading up to NYE.  Expect a Harpua on 12/30, and another set of standards for NYE.   The most likely candidates to show up on NYE? I&#8217;d have to bet on Lizards, Scents and Subtle Sounds, or Dinner and a Movie before any of the others.  But I&#8217;m expecting none of them.  Sigh.</p>
<p><small>* Edit: Add this song after the fact</small><br />
Anyway, know that if I catch any of my wishlist on NYE, I <strong>will </strong>go nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/phish-wishlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the Case: Time Turns Elastic</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/making-the-case-time-turns-elastic/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/making-the-case-time-turns-elastic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making the Case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trey Anastasio&#8217;s masterpiece &#8220;Time Turns Elastic&#8221; was written for an orchestra.
That&#8217;s what they tell us, at least.  It was performed with the New York Philharmonic in September of 2009.  A video surfaced, Trey playing TTE alone, acoustically.  And then there&#8217;s the Fenway debut.
Somehow, we find ourselves here in November, a few short [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trey Anastasio&#8217;s masterpiece &#8220;<strong>Time Turns Elastic</strong>&#8221; was written for an orchestra.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="padding:5px;" title="Time Turns Elastic" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/livemusicblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/time-turns-elastic.jpg" alt="" width="387" height="251" />That&#8217;s what they tell us, at least.  It was <a href="http://www.broadwayworld.com/article/NY_Philharmonic_Set_To_Premiere_TIME_TURNS_ELASTIC_By_Phishs_Trey_Anastasio_At_Carnegie_Hall_912_20090713">performed with the New York Philharmonic</a> in September of 2009.  A video surfaced, <a href="http://vimeo.com/5020855">Trey playing TTE</a> alone, acoustically.  And then there&#8217;s <a href="http://phish.net/setlists/?d=2009-05-31">the Fenway debut</a>.</p>
<p>Somehow, we find ourselves here in November, a few short months after the song was released, and many Phish fans, not just the next generation, are calling TTE the worst Phish song ever.  I hear &#8220;<a href="http://lynnguppy.blogspot.com/2009/06/phish-64-6509-jones-beach-ny.html">Time Turns Molasses</a>.&#8221;  I hear &#8220;<a href="http://www.phantasytour.com/phish/boards_thread.cgi?threadID=2116128&amp;page=1">Time Turns Craptastic</a>.&#8221; I hear &#8220;<a href="http://mog.com/phishandthedead/blog/1603508">Time&#8230; to pee</a>.&#8221; But why? Why do so many fans hate this song? Why don&#8217;t they see what I do in TTE?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s for a few reasons.  Firstly, this song took me a while to &#8220;get into.&#8221;  It&#8217;s a long song with many distinct sections, and most people, I honestly think, don&#8217;t take the time to listen to it to not only ingest it all, but to even get to know it all. Much of the instrumental part of TTE, I think, is really easier to appreciate as a musician.  Counting out some of the bits are a challenge.  Many people think the song rambles on for too long aimlessly.  Yet I can&#8217;t see any section of the song I&#8217;d want to trim out.  Every bit is great.  It&#8217;s said that Phish took something like 283 takes to get this track right.  I believe this, there are a lot of intricate bits to the song that would be a challenge to capture in one 13 minute chunk.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="padding:5px;" title="Trey Turns Elastic" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/livemusicblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/treyanastasiopic.jpg" alt="" width="253" height="250" />Which leads me to argument 2 against the song: it&#8217;s not been &#8220;nailed&#8221; yet live.   All of the performances thus far have ranged from &#8220;pretty lackluster&#8221; at worst to &#8220;decent&#8221; at best.  I was excited to get my TTE at Festival 8 only to have it crush under the weight of itself.  I love the song, and I&#8217;m willing to give Trey the benefit of the doubt and say that the cold air of night one of Festival 8 was responsible for so much of the fudging, but it was hard to hear the climax of the song, &#8220;The Carousel,&#8221; be executed so sloppily. <a href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/primetime_jew/item/curb_your_enthusiasm_review_seinfeld_reunion-finale_coffee_stain20091122/">Having said that</a>,  poor live execution does not a bad song make.</p>
<p>Clocking in at over 13 minutes (for the studio version, at least), and usually closer to 18 minutes live thus far, TTE is a big commitment in a set.  So it seems reasonable to assume that, in time, Phish will tire of a song like that in regular rotation.  When TTE becomes more of a rarity, more like a McGrupp, I bet people will start to think it&#8217;s more interesting to hear the song performed live.</p>
<p>The third argument for Time Turns Elastic is that it&#8217;s actually a suite of several smaller sections, which, as songs, aren&#8217;t nearly as tough to swallow.  The song is arranged as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>Movement 1a &#8211; Song At Dawn<br />
Movement 1b &#8211; Ruby Shaded Sea<br />
Movement 2a &#8211; Submarine<br />
Movement 2b &#8211; Landslide<br />
Movement 2c &#8211; Rays Of Blue Light<br />
Movement 3a &#8211; Silver Sound Shower<br />
Movement 3b &#8211; Hilstorm<br />
Movement 3c &#8211; Funnels<br />
Movement 3d &#8211; Carousel</p></blockquote>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://mrminer.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/times-turns-elastic-revisited/"><img class=" " style="padding: 3px;" title="Time Turns Elastic" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/livemusicblog.com/2009/03/nashville_ftr.jpg" alt="courtesy of Mr. Miner phishthoughts.com" width="300" height="286" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image courtesy of Mr. Miner</p></div>
<p>Surely, most would agree that the intro and the outro are the most identifiable and the easiest to digest at first glance.  It&#8217;s just parts of the middle that require some patience and some re-listening. If these parts were played on their own, they wouldn&#8217;t be hated.  So narrow it down for me: it&#8217;s obviously many smaller bits pieced together: which is the part(s) you don&#8217;t like? It can&#8217;t be all of them, because the odds of Phish writing so many greats songs and then 3 you hate all coincidentally stitched together are pretty much nil. So those who hate TTE probably aren&#8217;t talking about the entire song, but rather, some bit of it.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">If anyone has the gall to say &#8220;it&#8217;s too stretched out,&#8221; I&#8217;d tell them &#8220;you have no place at a Phish show.&#8221;  These same people would soil their pants for a 20+ minute jam of 46 Days, Down With Disease, or Split Open and Melt.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Not everyone has to love every Phish song.  Not every fan has to love TTE.  In fact, I understand and concede that TTE is not for everyone.  But it&#8217;s annoying me that it&#8217;s simply becoming &#8220;cool&#8221; to not like TTE or to call it the &#8220;bathroom break.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">I&#8217;ve heard stories that when the Grateful Dead debuted &#8220;Terrapin Station,&#8221; many fans were unsure of how to receive it.  It wasn&#8217;t bluesy, it didn&#8217;t rock, it wasn&#8217;t a ballad, and it was long.  Years later, many of us regard Terrapin as one of the band&#8217;s masterpieces. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">I think that many new fans, those that got into Phish during the post-breakup phase, are the ones most vocal about disliking TTE.  And many of them, I do in fact think, are simply naive noobs.   Some have a &#8220;kinda&#8221; fair argument: I like the song, I don&#8217;t like it live.   To them I say: many songs took a while to find their right incarnation and place in the Phish repetoire. Water in the Sky, Shafty, Limb by Limb, Black Eyed Katy/Moma, Tela, and many more went through revision before it found its sweet spot.  On the whole, I don&#8217;t think TTE is getting the love and patience it needs and deserves, so I&#8217;m <em>making the case</em>. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/making-the-case-time-turns-elastic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Festival 8</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/festival-8/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/festival-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s impossible to sum up all of my thoughts and feelings about Festival 8 in a way that would do any justice to my memory of it.  I know that to be true, but I&#8217;m going to try anyway, because it seems foolish to let this high fade over time, and I want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/festival8-ca.jpg" rel='lytebox[festival-8]'><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1518" style="padding:5px;" title="Festival 8 Cali" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/festival8-ca-150x150.jpg" alt="Festival 8 Cali" width="150" height="150" /></a>It&#8217;s impossible to sum up all of my thoughts and feelings about Festival 8 in a way that would do any justice to my memory of it.  I know that to be true, but I&#8217;m going to try anyway, because it seems foolish to let this high fade over time, and I want to remember how I feel so next time a festival comes around, I&#8217;ll know why I want to go.</p>
<p>I was a little nervous about this one for a number of reasons, because I didn&#8217;t want to go on an adventure like this without my wife; I didn&#8217;t want to miss my two year old&#8217;s first trick-or-treating adventure; I didn&#8217;t want to go cross country alone.  But a big one was that I didn&#8217;t want to go and be alone the whole time.  Sure, there were JAM listers who were going to be there, but sometimes you meet people in real life and it&#8217;s awkward, and you realize it was more natural when you were just talking to a screen.</p>
<p>I was lucky enough to have found a hotel where two of my new friends were staying, Scott and Elayne.  Elayne and I had arranged to carpool to the event.  I had softly pre-planned to meet a few people, so I figured I&#8217;d bum a ride the first day and then go my own way so as not to be a leech.</p>
<p>I got to the hotel around 5:30 or so, completely mentally drained and exhausted, and Elayne texted me that they were about to go on &#8220;an adventure&#8221; and &#8220;did I want to come?&#8221;  I knew blowing off the excursion was exactly the opposite of what I wanted the trip to be, so I threw my stuff in my room and headed out with Elayne, George, and their friend Jess.  Jess was working on site, so we stopped by to drop her off.  While waiting for her pass, I turned to George and whispered, &#8220;Hey, isn&#8217;t that Brad Sands?&#8221; &#8220;I don&#8217;t think Brad Sands works for them anymore,&#8221; he answered, at full volume.  Elayne shot him a dirty look and loudly whispered &#8211; &#8220;That IS Brad Sands!&#8221;  He was about 5 feet from us.  I imagine it was more awkward for him than us, since we were just excited to be there.</p>
<p>We lightly scoped the festival grounds and inadvertantly learned our way around Indio.  I was starting to fade from lack of food, so we found an authentic Mexican restaurant.  It&#8217;s hard to sum up how grea the meal was largely because I don&#8217;t know how good it actually was: at the time, it was incredible.  The best guacamole I&#8217;ve ever had combined with an array of homemade goods: crunky taco shells that were imperfectly crafted from freshly-fried hand-made corn tortillas, strechy and rich queso, thick and hearty chips&#8230; it was all perfect.  We followed the meal with a stop off at some of E &amp; G&#8217;s friends&#8217;, where I finally got to meet ZZYZX.  Afew hours later, day one was done and all that remained was the festival itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-1516"></span></p>
<h2>DAY ONE</h2>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/avatar.jpg" rel='lytebox[festival-8]'><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1517" style="padding:5px;" title="Festival 8" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/avatar-150x150.jpg" alt="Festival 8" width="150" height="150" /></a>An easy morning of lounging around laid the base.  We stopped at Wal-Mart for some essentials.  We tried to go to a burger joint called &#8220;Burgers and Beer&#8221; for lunch, but both of the locations on Google Maps were out of business, so we settled on Cactus Jack&#8217;s.  It was the perfect lunch, the &#8220;California Chicken&#8221; sandwich: a grilled chicken breast with swiss, bacon, and avacado on a bun.  Not too heavy, not too light, just right for a pre-concert meal.  No one wants to be carrying a lump of food in their stomach during a Phish show.</p>
<p>We got to the site around 1 anticipating traffic, but, much to our surprise, they waved us right in.  There was absolutely no back up due to, I&#8217;m sure, a combination of excellent planning and a venue that had so many ins-and-outs that there was nary a bottleneck.  On the way in, the promise of chocolate chip pancakes, corn dogs, veggie burritos, and much more suggested that there would be an array of foods and goods to make the event sustainable over several hours.</p>
<p>Security was relatively easy: no explanation necessary for my bag full of clothes that also had phone batteries, sealed water, Tylenol, and a pharmacy full of just-in-case stomach medications.  Entering the venue from the grounds was almost overwhelming.  There was a giant ferris wheel, a pizza stand, a small general store and a water stand.  For $10, you could buy a Nalgene bottle that would be freely refillable for the duration of the festival.  I bought one right as I entered.  It was hard to take it all in &#8211; there was so much to do and so much to see.  They were serving Sierra Nevada&#8217;s custom &#8220;Foam&#8221; beer.  There were bloody marys.  There was food &#8211; tons of it.  I mean tons.  Pizza, cheesesteak, chicken fingers, lemonade, ice cream, turkey wraps, burritos, nachos, hamburgers, garlic fries, coffee, gyros, hot waffles and ice cream, chocolate dipped cheesecake on a stick, fire-roasted artichokes&#8230; there was enough that you never needed more than 5 minutes in any line for anything you could envision.</p>
<p>It was hot &#8211; really hot.  But we shuffled through and made our way through the campground.  We found Scott, then Herschel.  We wandered through the field until we found Jack and Kat.  Then Phillip.  Then Charlie.   Slowly, the people with whom I&#8217;ve been working so closely for the last several months started to become real.  Before the event began, the first buzzkill of the weekend emerged: a guy dropped like a rock about 5 feet from us and had a wild and violent seizure.  It was so crowded that everyone had a &#8220;what should we do?&#8221; look.  Perplexed, we wondered: do we go for help and miss the set after everything? I wish I could even tell you what happened to the guy, because the band took the stage and I tuned out.  It got cold fast, set 1 began with jackets on.  A fun set from Party Time through Time Turns Elastic, even though the latter was pretty sloppy.  Clearly a &#8220;warm up&#8221; set, we all agreed, but there were some highlights &#8211; I specifically remember liking the Page song &#8220;Beauty of a Broken Heart&#8221;.  After some shirtless, drunk d-bag trampled Elayne and landed on ZZYZX&#8217;s feet (how fun to watch him man-up and scream at the guy &#8220;Get the fuck out of here&#8230; you fucking asshole!&#8221;), we used to setbreak to relocate to right behind the delay speaker stacks, which afforded us both more space and, frankly, better crisper sound.  The screens were such crispy HD signal that it was like watching a DVD, so much so that I probably spent only a small fraction of time scruntinizing the boys on stage.  Most of the time, it was either Kuroda&#8217;s majesty or the side screens pulling my eyes, so the location was great.  So great that we made it our home for the next 6 sets and much of the time in between.</p>
<p>Set 2 was more of the same: standard setlist, &#8220;clearly out the back catalog,&#8221; many said, but there were some clear highlights for sure.  Piper, Wolfman&#8217;s, Down With Disease, and Joy &#8211; which means so much mor to me now that I know it&#8217;s at least partly about daughters &#8211; were highlights.  It was pretty cold out at that point, but the music was keeping us warm.  Post-set, George and Elayne and I got in line for a post-show slice of pizza, and it was the perfect cap to the night.  Traffic out was drop-dead easy: we got in the car and waited a grand total of 45 seconds before exiting onto the main road.  We stopped at Wal-Mart for the second time that day on the way home to pick up water and some basic breakfast foods.  Got home about 1:30 and to sleep around 2.  Great day.</p>
<h2>DAY TWO</h2>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/3989305.0.jpg" rel='lytebox[festival-8]'><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1519" style="padding:5px;" title="Ticket" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/3989305.0-150x150.jpg" alt="Ticket" width="150" height="150" /></a>Day two was Halloween, and the most anticipated of the three days for most.  We stopped at Wal-Mart yet again for sunscreen and Tylenol for our aching foot muscles.  We left around 11 for the grounds because George and Elayne wanted to participate in the horsehoe contest.  We got to the grounds and were immediately presented a &#8220;Phishbill&#8221; revealing the musical costume of 2009: the Rolling Stones&#8217; Exile on Main St.  I had combed over many of the remaining albums and was really hoping for Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars, but once eliminated, I was pulling for Thriller or the elusive &#8220;100th album.&#8221;  So Exile was a disappointment for me, at first.  I was, however, happy to see Halloween in Miami announced.</p>
<p>Knowing that there were 100 options for food at the event, I split off for my own adventure.  I went to a &#8220;tweet up&#8221; to meet several folks I know from Twitter.  It was really cool to meet some of the people I&#8217;d spoken with so many times, a theme for the weekend, it seemed.  After the tweet-up, I met up with Herschel and Scott and we got some lunch.  It was ridiculously hot outside.  Despite the heat, there was much to do.  But it seemed that one of the most fun things to do was to meet at our central location &#8211; a large blanket that G&amp;E had decorated like basketball court for part of their group Halloween costume &#8211; and just hang out with the many cool people around.  It was a blast to spend some time with new and exciting people like Erik Janus and David &amp; Mel Steinberg, some of whom I knew before via email, some of whom I only met at the event.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T coverage seemed to stretch everywhere except the concert field, where even Edge coverage was spotty.  While in GPRS territory, from time to time, my phone would catch a signal and deliver a chunk of pending email.  It was a very odd experience to receive a message from people tagging my Facebook photos telling me to have a good time, only to find out that they were the friends of the very people I was sitting with.  Watching the &#8220;phamily&#8221; unfold was really something that can&#8217;t be explained to non-Phishheads.  George and Elayne rejoined us having secured a spot in the semi-finals.</p>
<p>Set 1 began not much later than expected, and it was a lot of fun.  Looking back at the setlist, I have to say that nothing really stands out as truly memorable.  Divided was great as always.  Kill Devil Falls, my absolute least favorite song off of Joy, was actually really well done and I appreciated it at the time.  I remember liking Gin and Coil, and Antelope was as rockin&#8217; as it usually is.  But nothing from Set 1 ranks among the top of the weekend.  Either way, the atmosphere made it taste like an appetizer.</p>
<p>It got dark and cold, but not nearly as cold as the night before.  The band took the stage after a 5 minute tribute video to their costume also-rans.  Busting in to Rocks Off was so much fun.  It&#8217;s one of my favorites off the album, so it was very welcome.  The band was joined by Sharon Jones and Shaundra Williams on vocals and The Dap Kings on horns.  And then Phish did what they normally do to me: they changed my mind. They made me enjoy Exile.  A few days out, I say what I didn&#8217;t then: after hearing Phish perform Exile, I&#8217;m learning to love it.  Is it just wacky psychology? Maybe.  But either way, you must hear their take.  Torn and Frayed is genius.  Shake Your Hips, Let It Loose, Casino Boogie, all great.  Loving Cup?  Probably the best ever.  The entire adventure was fun.</p>
<p>We did nothing between sets except hang out.  There was one dude, Z-Dogg &#8211; 16 years old and stoned out of his skull &#8211; who was just crashing all over everything and everyone&#8217;s stuff.  It was funny to watch this numbskull mope around looking for weed he could bum off of anyone.  And, strangely, I think his mother and father were with him constantly smoking him up.  Very weird.</p>
<p>Set 3 may have been the musical highlight of the weekend.  It started with an unexpected but triumphant Backwards Down the Number Line, a song that really captures some of Trey&#8217;s demons, but in a happy way, if that&#8217;s possible.  It was well executed and dropped into a well performed and powerful, if relatively standard Fluffhead.  Fluffhead morphed into one of the best Ghosts in recent memory.  I normally find When the Circus Comes to be a little too slow for most sets.  In short, it&#8217;s hard to recover the energy after such a slow song.  Fear not, after some deliberation, You Enjoy Myself came along and set things right.</p>
<p>For an encore the band re-emerged with Sharon Jones and the Dap Kings and tore through what most people are calling the best Suzy Greenbery ever.  It&#8217;s hard to argue it, the horns and the backup vox made this a really special and screaming Suzy, and it&#8217;s unlikely to be matched without a similiar lineup &#8211; ever.</p>
<p>In post show bliss, we got our post-show pizza and took a trafficless post-show drive to our post-show ritual Wal-Mart stop.  An all around great day.</p>
<h2>DAY THREE</h2>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/phish_festival.jpg" rel='lytebox[festival-8]'><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1520" style="padding:5px;" title="Phish Festival" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/phish_festival-150x150.jpg" alt="Phish Festival" width="150" height="150" /></a>Woke up early Sunday to make it to the acoustic set.  G &amp; E and Jess dropped their stuff in my room, they were checking out that day, abnd we were off.  We did NOT stop at Wal-Mart that day.</p>
<p>I was thinking that morning about how lucky I was to have met Elayne and George.  It could easily have been weird to be carpooling with people I didn&#8217;t know: I had figured, before getting there, that I would bum a ride the first day and then &#8220;do my thing&#8221; the remaining days.  But they were very cool and it was very chill with them, so I stuck around.  That morning, very casually, George said to me, &#8220;One of the coolest things about this festival was meeting you, you&#8217;re good people.&#8221;  I totally felt the same way, and it was true, for me,  that having a home base with cool people was elemental in the trip being successful.  It was a huge compliment to know that people I was enjoying hanging out with were enjoying hanging out with me too.  Especially those two.</p>
<p>We arrived to the only traffic of the weekend, I&#8217;m sure everyone was getting there at the same time for once, so we (ab)used Jess&#8217; artist pass to park in a special lot.  We trekked in to the first security backup of the weekend, but it wasn&#8217;t too bad, they let us in without much fuss.  We made it in time for the set, and it was a great set.  It was unlike any other Phish set&#8230; well, ever.  And when they switched from slow and mellow to upbeat via McGrupp and The Curtain, it made my day.  Talk was one of the bigger &#8220;bust outs&#8221; of the weekend, if you can call it that, and though the sun was killer, the experience was unforgettable.  When they played an acoustic encore, we spent the following hour debating how to represent the encore to a set in the setlist.  I got a chance to meet Ellis and his family, only missing a few Mockingbirders for the weekend.</p>
<p>Hopes were high for sets two and three, and they didn&#8217;t disappoint.  Set two began with a short and powerful AC/DC Bag dropping right into a clean and energeic Rift.  Then came Gotta Jibboo, one of my favorites of the weekend just because it was really well played.  Reba was nice, The Wedge and Guelah, two tunes that have been much rarer in recent years, followed.  Undermind is, perhaps, going to go down as my favorite song of the festival.  The reworked version is the same they played at the soundcheck, but it&#8217;s so funky and fun.  A standard Sparkle preceded a very welcome Split Open and Melt.  All in all, good set. In between, we got to meet Julia, who, believe it or not, actually exists, and is not, as is often claimed, Mike Gordon.  [If, however, anyone would go to the trouble of hiring a temporary stand-in just to fool with us.. oh, and also create a Facebook and Twitter page for her, well, that'd be Mike.]  Either way, we met a person claiming to be her, unfortunately, she arrived just as the set started, leaving us no time to actually talk to her.</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t get cold for set 3, which was welcome.  By this point, everyone was realizing that the weekend was winding down.  So we settled in, knowing, as well as one can, that we were in for a Tweezer.  And we were, Set 3 opened with Tweezer -&gt; Maze.  Then came some very good songs: Free, my first Sugar Shack, a high-energy Limb By Limb, and a heavy Theme From the Bottom.  The closing series was Mike&#8217;s Song &gt; 2001 &gt; Light &gt; Slave to the Traffic Light, which is very hard to beat.  I love Light, this one is being debated on many discussion groups as great vs standard, but I love Light, and given the atmosphere, I call it great.  And, as you may know, I&#8217;ve already <a href="http://firsttube.com/read/Making-the-Case-The-Best-Phish-Song/">made the case for Slave</a>.</p>
<p>The encore was a slightly different Grind, followed by an unexpected and oddly placed Esther.  And then, with the hard-hitting mini-jam of Tweezer Reprise, the weekend was over.</p>
<p>I passed on the pizza on Sunday.  Instead, I sat back and took it all in.  Festival 8 was over.  And it was awesome.</p>
<p>I fell asleep on the drive home (I was Z-dogg&#8217;in it, you could say), I said goodbye to G&amp;E and went to sleep.</p>
<h2>GOING HOME</h2>
<p><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/30412871-30412876-slarge.jpg" rel='lytebox[festival-8]'><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1522" style="padding:5px;" title="Trey" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/11/30412871-30412876-slarge-150x150.jpg" alt="Trey" width="150" height="150" /></a>The next day, I was set to travel home.  When I got to the Ontario airport after my maiden voyage to <a href="http://avocadoburger.com/">Avocado Burger</a>. In a welcome coincidence, I was on the same flight as Jack and Kat.  I got a chance to spend a few minutes chatting up Mockingbird business with him.  Good times. The flight from Vegas to Orlando wasn&#8217;t bad at all &#8211; smooth and generally uneventful, the way I like my flights.<br />
It&#8217;s hard to communicate to those who missed it what 8 was like.  They can listen to the MP3s, they can look at pictures, they can hear the stories, but they probably can&#8217;t appreciate just how amazing the whole vibe was, how free the whole atmosphere was, they way we were welcomed by the city and the venue, how the weather, and the organization, and the hotels, and the restaurants, and the friends blended together into such an event.  I suppose all that can be said is &#8220;I hope this happens once again!&#8221;</p>
<p>See you at 9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/festival-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concert Review: The Decemberists 09/30/09</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/concert-review-the-decemberists-093009/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/concert-review-the-decemberists-093009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Decemberists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday night, Jenn and I went with an old college friend of mine to see The Decemberists, who are touring in support of their &#8220;Hazards of Love&#8221; album.  As expected, the concert did not disappoint.  
The first set, as it has been nearly the entire tour, was the Hazards of Love rock [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday night, Jenn and I went with an old college friend of mine to see <a href="http://www.decemberists.com/">The Decemberists</a>, who are touring in support of their &#8220;<a href="http://firsttube.com/read/the-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love/">Hazards of Love</a>&#8221; album.  As expected, the concert did not disappoint.  </p>
<p>The first set, as it has been nearly the entire tour, was the Hazards of Love rock opera, in its entirety, in order, without pause.  Although I&#8217;ve listened to this album through many (what is sure to be over 100) times by now, it certainly tiring in the best possible way for even an audience member to watch it straight through.  The music is fantastic, but watching them recreate virtually every note, watching them very intentionally work towards preserving the flawless segues by wearing electric guitars through acoustic songs, it was just awesome.  </p>
<div class="setlistImage" style="text-align: center;margin:10px 0;"><a title="The Decemberists Setlist Hard Rock Live, Orlando, FL, USA 2009, A Short Fazed Hovel Tour " href="http://www.setlist.fm/setlist/the-decemberists/2009/hard-rock-live-orlando-fl-bd7fd72.html" target="_blank"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://www.setlist.fm/widgets/setlist-image-v1?id=bd7fd72&amp;fg=222222&amp;border=990000" alt="The Decemberists Setlist Hard Rock Live, Orlando, FL, USA 2009, A Short Fazed Hovel Tour " /></a>
</div>
<p>With no idle chatter, no classic Decemberists raucous through the first set, the second set was decidedly different.  With a fun set that featured long and playful sing-alongs, humorous anecdotes, crowd surfing, cartwheels, and even a brief tease of &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Gifts">Simple Gifts</a>,&#8221; even the less hardcore fans peppered throughout the crowd could be spotted bopping their heads, laughing, singing, and having a good time.  Featuring the first performance of &#8220;Everything I Try to Do, Nothing Seems to Turn Out Right&#8221; since 2002 and the debut of a song &#8220;about Florida&#8221;, the set ranged from just plain fun &#8211; Meloy handed his guitar to someone in the audience to play &#8211; to display of raw talent &#8211; <a href="http://sharaworden.com/">Shara Worden</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becky_Stark">Becky Stark</a> admirably channeling Ann Wilson and crushing Heart&#8217;s &#8220;Crazy on You&#8221; like only a few on this planet could.  It was total enjoyment.  </p>
<p>The Decemberists are bold in their presentation and put on a show that is incredibly compelling.  Some call them &#8211; and their performance &#8211; arrogant and exclusive.  I prefer to think of the Decemberists like a fine wine: it&#8217;s challenging, it&#8217;s enjoyable, each year is significantly different, and it&#8217;s ultimately incredibly satisfying.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/concert-review-the-decemberists-093009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson: An Audio Blog Experiment</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/michael-jackson-the-king-of-pop/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/michael-jackson-the-king-of-pop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author insert a music with WS Audio Player(Download) this music.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br />Author insert a music with <a href="http://icyleaf.com/projects/ws-audio-player/">WS Audio Player</a><br />(<a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/audio/MJ.mp3" />Download</a>) this music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/michael-jackson-the-king-of-pop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://firsttube.com/uploads/audio/MJ.mp3" length="4626292" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Decemberists&#8217; &#8220;The Hazards of Love&#8221;: An Interpretation</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/the-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/the-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Decemberists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Decemberists album was loosed last Tuesday, March 24, and has been met with enthusiasm almost universally.  I purchase only a few discs a year these days, preferring to spend the majority of my music dollars online.  This disc, I knew in advance, would be one of my purchases.
Upon purchase, I quickly came to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Decemberists album was loosed last Tuesday, March 24, and has been met with enthusiasm almost universally.  I purchase only a few discs a year these days, preferring to spend the majority of my music dollars online.  This disc, I knew in advance, would be one of my purchases.</p>
<p>Upon purchase, I quickly came to understand that &#8220;The Hazards of Love&#8221; is a concept album in the truest sense: the songs are a single, uninterrupted blob &#8211; continuous sound from the haunting opening notes of &#8220;Prelude&#8221; to the final waves of &#8220;The Hazards of Love, Part 4.&#8221;  The challenge, as with any Decemberists offering, is to decipher the meaning of the often Victorian-style lyrics, and with &#8220;The Hazards of Love,&#8221; it&#8217;s proven to be a challenge.  However, within, find my interpretation of the Hazards of Love story.</p>
<p>Before I get into it, let me address a few complaints I have with this album:</p>
<ol class="ol">
<li> The CD liner smells like a camel pen</li>
<li>The font in the liner booklet is far too small, doubling the challenge</li>
<li>That&#8217;s it</li>
</ol>
<p>I have no other complaints about this disc at all.  In fact, I&#8217;ve read only two complaints online, the first being that the talented Jenny Conlee is underused.  To those who have noted that, I urge you to relisten.  Her harpsichord, the Hammond, and her accordion can be heard throughout the album, and while she certainly takes a backseat on some songs, she provides depth to many of the themes that might otherwise deliver much less forcefully their message.</p>
<p>To those  who felt this album is too &#8220;heavy metal&#8221; and too far a departure from previous Decemberists material, I ask you to relisten paying greater attention to the story.  There is no unnecessary &#8220;metal&#8221; here.  There is only emotion to properly align to the lyrics.  The queen is accompanied by loud electric guitar.</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s get on with it, shall we? Please read on, I&#8217;ll include my entire dissection of &#8220;The Hazards of Love.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-1212"></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img title="The Hazards of Love" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/thol.jpg" alt="The Hazards of Love" width="450" height="355" /></p>
<p><strong>The Hazards of Love 1 (The Prettiest Whistles Won&#8217;t Wrestle the Thistles Undone)</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1213" style="float:right;padding:5px;" title="Margaret" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/margaret.jpg" alt="Margaret" width="300" height="306" />This song sets up the entire story.  We learn right away that a young lady &#8211; who we will later love as our heroine Margaret &#8211; goes horseriding out past the fields, far from home.  She crosses into the forest, as she often does, and comes upon a young deer at the edge of the forest, injured and limping, but despite the rapidly approaching dusk (&#8220;<em>white and green and gray</em>&#8220;), being a woman, the fairer, caring gender, she dismounts and tries to help the fawn.  Before she can assist, she feels a sharp shake of the ground, and the fawn shifts shape into a man.  She glances upon the man and falls immediately in love with him, and he with her.</p>
<p>They have sex, right there, in the forest, upon the forest floor, flowers and leaf beds (the &#8220;<em>thistles</em>&#8220;) providing the only padding.</p>
<p>Later, back in the grounds of the village,  the ladies relax and chit-chat, worry-free and without care, except one: our Margaret, who is otherwise distracted and thinking of her William and their marvelous encounters in the forest.</p>
<p><strong>A Bower Song</strong></p>
<p>Margaret&#8217;s sister, or perhaps just another maiden (<b>Edit:</b> or a nun), approaches and says to our heroine, &#8220;Don&#8217;t cry, Margaret! I know you&#8217;re pregnant, when are you going to give birth? And, by the way, which of the jerks around town is your baby daddy?&#8221; (I had some trouble with the line &#8220;<em>when wilt thou trouble the water in the cistern</em>&#8220;, but I&#8217;ve decided that troubling the water must mean draining it or reducing the level, which would mean an event that would require lots of cleaning, in short: the birth.)  As Margaret&#8217;s baby bump begins to show, rather than stay with the maidens and be exposed, she packs her things and heads back to the forest to find her William.</p>
<p><strong>Won&#8217;t Want For Love</strong></p>
<p>Our Margaret makes her way back to the forest in search of William, begging the forest as she goes to create a path to lead her to William and to alert him that she seeks him.  As she grows tired, she makes a bed in the forest, just as she and William shared a leafy bed in moons past.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, not so far away, William calls to Margaret, he pains to be with her.</p>
<p><strong>The Hazards of Love  2 (Wager All)</strong></p>
<p><img style="float:left;padding:5px;" title="William" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/william.jpg" alt="William" width="300" height="319" />William finds Margaret and they declare their love for one another.  William tenderly confesses that he feels more for her than just a need for sex, rather, he loves her.  He lays her down in soft clovers and makes love to her beneath the sky.  In post-coital bliss, he tells he that he wishes that they could lay together all night, naked, until the morning birds sing.  We&#8217;ll later learn that he explains his predicament: his mother, the Queen of the Forest, she who rescued him from a clay cradle in the rough rivers, has cast a spell upon him.  He will live the remainder of his days as a fawn by day, a man only by night.  But he will risk everything for Margaret, he will face his mother, in due time&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>The Queen&#8217;s Approach</strong></p>
<p>Unbeknownst to our lovers, William&#8217;s adoptive mother, the Queen, approaches.  Our lovers, in great haste, part ways once again. <b>Update</b>: I&#8217;ve been rethinking this.  It makes more sense that the Queen <i>catches</i> William and Margaret, and as a result, she forbids William from going out at night.  That&#8217;s why they&#8217;ve spent nights together, but he must beg his mother to let him out in &#8220;The Wanting Comes in Waves/Repaid&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Isn&#8217;t It a Lovely Night?</strong></p>
<p>I like to believe that our lovers sing this song while together, but it makes more sense to me that as Margaret soliloquizes from her perch in the forest, William sings from afar.  Margaret remains, perhaps, in the bed of flowers and clovers referenced earlier that she and William had shared.  She cherishes her baby-to-be, the child of William.  William, retreating to his forest dwelling, smiles giddily remembering how the breeze bent the leaves which tickled him as he made love to Margaret in the brush. <del datetime="2009-04-06T20:26:14+00:00"> Each agrees that in many ways, parting again is like dying a little death.</del> <b>Update</b>: As pointed out in the comments below, &#8220;little death&#8221; is middle English slang for orgasm.  Make of that what you will. </p>
<p><strong>The Wanting Comes in Waves/Repaid</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;display:block;"><img style="padding:5px;" title="The Queen" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/queen.jpg" alt="The Queen" width="400" height="414" /></p>
<p>Now the story gets interesting.  The Queen &#8212; William&#8217;s adoptive mother &#8212; finds William, <del datetime="2009-04-06T20:32:01+00:00">and although she hasn&#8217;t caught him in the act,</del>, she knows that he&#8217;s been out sleeping with a woman.   In anger, he tells her that he heard her coming, her approach was betrayed by the weight of her footsteps, much like black smoke covering a coffin precedes a funeral. He tells her that he wants this night to do as he pleases, for the need to be with her is strong, and although he can suppress it from time to time, sometimes, he cannot (hence, <em>the wanting comes in waves</em>).  </p>
<p>She responds: &#8220;Hold on, I saved you from the river.  I cradled you.  I raised you.  I protected you.  You belong to me.  And now you want the night, the only time you&#8217;re a man, to spend with <em>other</em> women?   This is how you repay me for the years I spent as your mother?&#8221;</p>
<p>He bargains with her; he makes a foolish, pennywise offer: let me free for this one night, and I will return by dawn, and I will be yours forever.  Of course, we already know, he&#8217;s planning to run with Margaret.  After all, he&#8217;d &#8220;<em>wager all</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Th mother thinks this over and carefully responds: &#8220;Ok, you can have tonight &#8211; total freedom.  But here&#8217;s the catch, as you promised, come morning,  you belong to me for all future nights.  You just cashed in your one favor, m&#8217;boy, from here on out, we&#8217;re sqaure.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>An Interlude</strong></p>
<p>Relax and enjoy friends, we&#8217;ve know the backstory, here&#8217;s where the adventure begins.</p>
<p><strong>The Rake&#8217;s Song</strong></p>
<p><img style="float:right;padding:5px;" title="The Rake" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/rake.jpg" alt="The Rake" width="272" height="416" />Enter: The Rake.  The Rake is a vile man, married young.  The first 9 or so months of marriage was great, as he got lots of sex from his wife.  Of course, there was one unintended consequenece: she started having babies.  However, when delivering her fourth child, she and the baby died, leaving the rake with three kids and no chance to have the amount of sex he was craving. So he sets about to change his life: he poisons Charlotte by feeding her bad flowers.  He drowns poor Dawn in the bathtub.   And while his son Isiah struggles admirably, nonetheless, he kills him, and in response to the fighting, he burns the body.  Though we might think he&#8217;d be bothered by all of this, he assures us, it&#8217;s never really bothered him.</p>
<p><strong>The Abduction of Margaret</strong></p>
<p>The rake hides in the bushes, the very same bushes in which William and Margaret enjoyed their first enounter together.  As Margaret passes, the rake grabs her, binds her hands, throws her over his shoulder then across his horse, galloping away.  Then he comes to Annan Water, the uncrossable wild river, the very river from which the Queen once rescued baby William!</p>
<p><strong>The Queen&#8217;s Rebuke/The Crossing</strong></p>
<p>Here we learn the backstory I referred to above: the Queen, she of the very fabric of the forest, found William in a clay cradle.  She took the poor baby and gave him the form of a fawn by day.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;So,&#8221; </em>she says to the Rake,<em> &#8220;since you have kidnapped Margaret, the only thing that has ever tempted my poor boy to defy me, I will fly you over the uncrossable Annan Water, so that William will be unable to chase you.  In exchange, you may keep young Margaret, to do with as you will, including raping and killing her, if you so desire.&#8221; </em></p>
<p><strong>Annan Water</strong></p>
<p>Meanwhile, William discovers that Margaret is nowhere to found, and upon tracking her trail, soon learns that she has been abducted.  He begins his quest to rescue her, but soon finds himself at the bank of Annan Water, the uncrossable river.  The river is far too wild and untamed to be crossed without a suitable boat of some sort,  a device which he neither has nor has time to make.  His horse would never make it across, and his mother has warned him many times that attempting to cross on horse would certainly end in his death.</p>
<p>But William is close, and can hear poor Margaret&#8217;s screams.  He is due to return to his mother for eternity and Margaret is captured by the Rake.  Desperate, he beckons the river: &#8220;P<em>lease, river, let me cross.  As I cannot grow wings and fly across, calm your waters and let me save my love.  If you do this, I will return, and if you desire, you can have my body then.  I will willingly submit myself to you.  Just let me pass to rescue my Margaret!&#8221; </em></p>
<p><strong>Margaret In Captivity</strong></p>
<p>The Rake, in one of the particularly creepy moments of the tale, paces about the bound Margaret in a small, abandoned forest castle, leans in, and tells her pointedly, &#8220;<em>My swan, do not struggle, as you will only cause yourself rope burns or break your precious wrists and fingers. </em>&#8221;</p>
<p>But she calls for William.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Don&#8217;t bother getting your hopes up</em>,&#8221; the Rake continues, &#8220;<em>no one will hear you, and no one will find you.  At least not before I&#8217;ve raped and killed you.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>But she calls for William!</p>
<p><strong>The Hazards of Love 3 (Revenge!)</strong></p>
<p>The song begins with theme from &#8220;The Wanting Comes in Waves,&#8221; which we know, by now, is William&#8217;s theme.  William comes for his Margaret! But is he in time?</p>
<p>But wait! What is that sound? It&#8217;s the ghost of Charlotte, come to warn her father that his children have returned, she rises. Enter Dawn, chastising papa for keeping the water running, but fear not &#8211; she breathes again.  And Isiah,  the struggling son, has returned as well.  In fact, the Rake is driven mad by the return of his vengeful children.</p>
<p>The children have saved Margaret temporarily, but for long enough?</p>
<p><strong>The Wanting Comes in Waves (Reprise)</strong></p>
<p>The lack of lyrics here leave much of the story up to us, so here is how I see it: as the Rake is struggling with the ghosts of his late children, William triumphantly bursts into the fortress, killing the Rake, and saving his Margaret!  He pulls loose her binds and they leave the body of the Rake behind to be forgotten.</p>
<p><strong>The Hazards of Love 4 (The Drowned)</strong></p>
<p>No Decemberists adventure is complete without a tragic ending.  This one bothers me more than most.  I wish it didn&#8217;t end this way, but I think it&#8217;s clear what happens.</p>
<p>William and Margaret are now stuck on the far side of Annan Water.  They attempt to cross, but the waters, obeying William&#8217;s one-time wish, attempt to claim his body, as he promised.  He cannot escape Annan Water like he did his mother.  So, as he and Margaret struggle to stay above water, William asks Margaret to marry him, with only the waves to witness their matrimony.</p>
<p>William&#8217;s debt to the water exists, of course, only because he decided to rescue Margaret, and Margaret knows this. What is left for our star-crossed lovers? William can only be a man during the day and his nights are promised to his mother, who will stop at nothing to prevent Margaret and William from being together. Margaret cannot return home with child.  William cannot stay in the forest, as he has crossed his mother, and she has sent the Rake after Margaret.  It looks like there will be no happy ending for our hero and heroine.   </p>
<p>In their last moments, they swear eternal loyalty to one another and share a final and touching kiss as the air rushes from their lungs and, then, gently and willingly, they submit to the rough waters of Annan.  And with that, our poor lovers break the surface and rest, entwined, at peace, undisturbed, in Annan Water, for eternity.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>What we don&#8217;t know is whether or not the child has survived.  It would be nice to think that Margaret has actually delivered the baby and that the poor child survives.  It&#8217;s funny to think that somehow, William himself was abandoned in the forest.  However, it seems unlikely that Margaret would have been wandering for the Rake to seize her without her baby.  I fear the child has gone to the eternal rest with his parents.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s sad to think that William and Margaret were unable to escape and live happily ever after.  I&#8217;ve listened to the album several times through, and I fear I cannot find any way to bend the story such that they don&#8217;t die.  Unfortunately, this is one section of the lyrics that is relatively straightforward.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img title="Flyer" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/flyer.jpg" alt="Flyer" width="429" height="482" /></p>
<p>A note on geography: the first Hazards of Love makes reference to Offa&#8217;s Wall.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offa's_Dyke">Offa&#8217;s Dyke</a> is, according to Wikipedia, &#8220;is a massive linear earthwork, roughly following some of the current border between England and Wales.&#8221; That, it would seem, puts us in the British isles.  The Rake&#8217;s fourth child was named &#8220;Myfanwy,&#8221; which is an Welsh name, which seems to set us firmly in Welch territory. The only hesitation I have on this is that the taiga, referenced a few times, doesn&#8217;t extend to Wales.  </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/03/taiga.png" alt="Taiga" title="Taiga" width="550" height="274" /></p>
<p>There is a town called Annan Water in Scotland, not far from Glasgow, which I found by simply Googling Annan Water.  It doesn&#8217;t appear there is taiga in Scotland, although there are apparently &#8220;taiga bean geese&#8221; which are nearly extinction.  Given that Annan Water is in Scotland, but Offa&#8217;s Dyke in Wales, I think it&#8217;s safe to give Meloy and crew some poetic license and simply conclude that it&#8217;s either Wales, England, or Scotland.  I&#8217;m even willing to grant that the &#8220;taiga&#8221; we&#8217;re referring to is only cold forest, but that, for literary amusement, we&#8217;re calling it taiga.  I may be wrong here, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessary to plot the location with GPS precision.  </p>
<p>The incredible story of this album is puntuated by the recurring themes of the music and the associated voices.  I am absolutely haunted by Queen, voiced by the incredibly vocally gifted Shara Worden of My Brightest Diamond.  Her last note of &#8220;Repaid&#8221; is one of the most amazing moments of the story.  She conveys the Queen&#8217;s seriousness in one dramatic note.</p>
<p>The tragic story of <strong><em>The Hazards of Love</em></strong> is one that is best understood upon multiple listenings.  Take the time to pass over it more than once before passing judgement, as a complete package, it&#8217;s absolutely enchanting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/the-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check This Out: Sense Field&#8217;s Building</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-sense-field-building/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-sense-field-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check This Out!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttube.com/?p=1138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word &#8220;Emo&#8221; has been overused for many years now, and , in fact, in many circles, has become a pejorative term for a goth-lite teenager with eyeliner, or some equally unattractive image.  Long ago, in the mid 1990s, it emerged as shorthand for &#8220;emotional hardcore.&#8221; When the term &#8220;emo&#8221; was first coined, this type [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;Emo&#8221; has been overused for many years now, and , in fact, in many circles, has become a pejorative term for a goth-lite teenager with eyeliner, or some equally unattractive image.  Long ago, in the mid 1990s, it emerged as shorthand for &#8220;emotional hardcore.&#8221; When the term &#8220;emo&#8221; was first coined, this type music was much less mainstream, the bands were not universally accepted or treated as commercially viable yet, and the listeners were a small, more tight-knit group. The bands were generally referred to as &#8220;pop punk&#8221; or &#8220;punk hardcore,&#8221; delivering a slight edge over standard punk, and in most cases, a dose of melody through the distortion.</p>
<p><img style="padding: 5px; width: 280px; height: 280px; float: right;" title="Sense Field: Building" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/02/514kh1iuw1l_sl500_aa280_.jpg" alt="Sense Field: Building" />From this scene, many bands grew, most notably in my mind: Gorilla Biscuits, Fugazi, Quicksand, Sunny Day Real Estate, and many others.  Also a defining moment in emo history was the release of the commercial flop &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000W297QY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=firsttubecom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000W297QY">Pinkerton</a>,&#8221; Weezer&#8217;s 1995 masterpiece, which is now often considered the band&#8217;s best release.  Although once very popular in this scene, one band that is largely forgotten is &#8220;Sense Field.&#8221;  From California, former members of <em>Reason to Believe</em> got together and created several demos before releasing the eponymous <em>Sense Field</em>. 1994 welcomed the beautiful <em>Killed for Less</em>, which is a great album: fantastic music, but in contrast, still maturing lyrically.  Then, shortly thereafter, Sense Field delivered <em>Building</em>.  <em>Building </em>is an amazing album, full of energy, fun, kicking beat, and melody.  The unique voice of lead singer Jon Bunch (who later fronted Further Seems Forever) is especially well suited for this type of music, which captures the 90s Gen-X angst that had yet to become whiny and obnoxious Gen-Y posing.</p>
<p>The first track of <em>Building</em>, called <em>Overstand</em>, is a short but sweet song that will hook you.  If you like this style of music, you&#8217;ll be ready to delve in further right away.  Side 1 will just keep kicking your butt.  This generally continues through <em>Different Times, Will</em>, and <em>Leia</em>, and lasts all the way through the final track, <em>Sight Unseen</em>, which is also in the run for my favorite.  In fact, there&#8217;s only one song on this CD that I&#8217;m not crazy about, but lest I spoil you, I&#8217;ll keep it a mystery.  The fact remains that Sense Field delivered and then some with <em>Building</em>.</p>
<p>Sense Field went on to record three more albums including an EP, however, the final two albums never really had the magic spark, which singer Jon Bunch attributed to several factors, including the label pressures and bad financial decisions, but moreso to the fact that the scene had changed and the guys had just lost their passion for that band at that time.   I was able to see Sense Field on the east coast twice on two different tours, and the final time, I was able not only to meet them all, but also chat with them.  It was sad that so few people appeared to know their songs and their history.  Unfortunately, Sense Field is likely to be most remembered for their one radio hit, &#8220;Save Yourself,&#8221; about abstinence, which may have ironically led to their downfall.  Not only did the song get them labeled a &#8220;Christian band&#8221; (&#8220;<em>not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, but we&#8217;re not a Christian band,</em>&#8221; says Bunch) , but it also gave people a taste of Sense Field that really wasn&#8217;t who they were, leading people to check them out and then potentially be disappointed.</p>
<p>Nothing will change the fact that <em>Building</em> was and remains and incredible album, strangely as strong today as it was then.  Check out <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0013D6T3U?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=firsttubecom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0013D6T3U">Sense Field&#8217;s Building</a> on Amazon.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-sense-field-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check This Out: Something Corporate&#8217;s Leaving Through the Window</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-something-corporate/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-something-corporate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check This Out!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early 00&#8217;s, there was a flood of what I call &#8220;new punk&#8221; or &#8220;candy punk&#8221; on the music scene, fronted by several bands, some of which I really liked.  Yellowcard, New Found Glory, and many others were amongst the successful, and they brought a combination of punk, rock, and run-of-the-mill pop music [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early 00&#8217;s, there was a flood of what I call &#8220;new punk&#8221; or &#8220;candy punk&#8221; on the music scene, fronted by several bands, some of which I really liked.  Yellowcard, New Found Glory, and many others were amongst the successful, and they brought a combination of punk, rock, and run-of-the-mill pop music together.  Amongst that group was a band that was unfairly seen, I think, as one of the &#8220;candy punk.&#8221; Something Corporate demonstrated, on their two major releases, some brilliant song writing, some beautiful composition, and great musicality.</p>
<p><img class="wp-image-1036" style="width: 305px; height: 305px; float: left;" title="Leaving Through the Window" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2009/01/4100mn6w7pl_ss500_.jpg" alt="Leaving Through the Window" />The singles released from &#8220;Leaving Though the Window,&#8221; their first album, include &#8220;Punk Rock Princess&#8221; and &#8220;If U C Jorden&#8221;, both of which, I think, hold up well today.  But the masterpieces are in between: the gorgeous harmony of &#8220;Hurricane,&#8221; the slow rocking of &#8220;Fall,&#8221; the bounce of &#8220;I Woke Up in a Car,&#8221; the humor of &#8220;Drunk Girl.&#8221; Something Corporate was able to convey a sense of humor balanced against their strong composition.  For example, without sounding didactic &#8211; the way they build up to the first chorus but pull it away in favor of another verse; or the way a first chorus will only give you half the lines before the fuller subsequent ones.  &#8220;Leave &#8216;em wanting more&#8221; really does apply with music, and it leads to repeat listens.</p>
<p>What makes Something Corporate unique is that they are built around the piano played by their frontman, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McMahon">Andrew McMahon</a>.  As a result, every song has a depth and tone missed by second rate bands like &#8220;Panic! At the Disco&#8221; and &#8220;Fall Out Boy&#8221; driven by almost entirely by power chords.   The future for Something Corporate is definitely cloudy: McMahon was diagnosed with leukemia shortly after recording a solo album mid-decade and has gone on record suggesting his interest in Something Corporate is more nostalgic than create, but also as suggesting that not ever recording and touring again would be a let down to fans.  Not counting demos, EPs, maxi-singles, and earlier releases, we only have two major releases for this young and talented band.  Every single song on &#8220;Leaving Through the Window&#8221; is worth a listen.  You should <em>check it out</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-something-corporate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G&#8217;n&#039;F&#8217;n&#039;R: Chinese Democracy Review</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/chinese-democracy-review/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/chinese-democracy-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a huge Guns N&#8217; Roses fan, back in the day.  In 7th grade, in 1988, I got introduced to G&#8217;n'R, and I just loved it.  I swallowed up every song on Appetite for Destruction and Lies.  Hunted down Live Like a Suicide.  Found all their demos like &#8220;Crash Diet.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a huge Guns N&#8217; Roses fan, back in the day.  In 7th grade, in 1988, I got introduced to G&#8217;n'R, and I just loved it.  I swallowed up every song on Appetite for Destruction and Lies.  Hunted down Live Like a Suicide.  Found all their demos like &#8220;Crash Diet.&#8221;  I stuck by them through Use Your Illusion I and II &#8211; got them both sight unseen on opening day.  Saw them live in &#8216;92.  I even bought <em>The Spaghetti Incident?!</em> in 1993.  As the next album delay began, my interest began to wane.  I went from superfan to fan to casual fan to indifferent to hating Axl&#8217;s winded comeback performance to casually interested to seeking out <em>Chinese Democracy</em>.  And now I have it.  I&#8217;ll spare you the reading: I&#8217;m a fan again.  </p>
<p>I could&#8217;ve told you well ahead of time how much this album was going to suck.  After all, it&#8217;s been 14 years in the making.  Axl has gone through several line up changes and at least 3 lead guitarists since Slash.  All of them have some appearance on the album, I&#8217;m told.  14 years of nonstop revision has got to lead to the inability to be objective.  And it&#8217;s gotta be overproduced as all hell as Axl does nonstop tweaking.    </p>
<p>So when I got my hands on the album and gave it a listen, I was surprised to find that it was actually&#8230; pretty damned good.  Read on for the full treatment.<br />
<span id="more-986"></span><br />
<a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/12/61kbzlewkml._ss500_.jpg" rel='lytebox[chinese-democracy-review]'><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-988" title="Chinese Democracy" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/12/61kbzlewkml._ss500_-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>The album starts with the title track, which, I have to say, is one of my least favorites. The good news is that it rocks.  It starts off with a long build, and when it kicks in, it has a nice rhythm, but sadly, the whole thing builds to an expected chorus that just never arrives.  It&#8217;s a decent track, but only that: decent.</p>
<p>Track 2 is <em>Shackler&#8217;s Revenge</em>, which many might recognize since it was included in Rock Band 2 (or Guitar Hero, one of those) pre-release.   This is another heavier song with a good rolling guitar line and a fun dancing hi-hat chorus.  It&#8217;s got Axl&#8217;s signature self-harmony in the verses and some creative overdubbing in the chorus, which is both memorable and catchy.  The main guitar line riff almost sounds like 1990&#8217;s Ozzy Osbourne (Zak Wylde era), because of the harmonics. </p>
<p><em>Better</em>, a several years-old track, was leaked long ago.  Although at first you might find it foreign, it&#8217;s a great song.   This song sounds like the most natural progression of Guns N&#8217; Roses so far.  It has a very nice riff which serves as the chorus melody and overlaps the verses nicely too; good song writing.    Also, the band teams up to deliver well on this.  The drum line and the stringed instruments work very well on this to deliver a complete, seamless song.  This version is definitely better than any previous iteration.  </p>
<p>Track 4, <em>Street of Dreams</em>, starts like an Elton John song, but rapidly develops a very familiar GNR feel.   It has a nice <em>Use Your Illusion II</em> vibe, sounding quite a bit like <em>Estranged</em>, but ultimately really taking a place as the <em>Yesterdays </em>of this album.  The song used to be called &#8220;The Blues&#8221; in previous performances, and I suspect there&#8217;s a little bit of autobiography in it.  When Axl says, &#8220;<em>What this means to me is more than I know you believe</em>,&#8221; a part of me thinks maybe it&#8217;s his confession that he really wants us to love this album after he&#8217;s slaved over it so long. </p>
<p><em>If The World</em>, the fifth track, begins with an almost Middle Eastern flavor.  But it&#8217;s deceptive, because it actually mutates into a funky power ballad.  Again, it feels like a natural, more relevant Guns N&#8217; Roses.  The drums and rhythm are really nicely recorded.  They have a very nice electronica feel, without getting cheesy, and yet, seem in place.  Good track.  </p>
<p><em>There Was a Time</em> is, in my mind, straight outta the GNR songbook.  It feels like a cross between a song of <em>Appetite </em>and <em>Use Your Illusion I</em>.   The chorus is not nearly as melodic as I&#8217;d like, but the verses are really nicely done and it&#8217;s very typical Axl.  Ultimately, this song&#8217;s bridge makes up for the lack of melody, and it remains a solid, familiar GNR song.  </p>
<p>I like <em>Catcher in the Rye</em>, although, I can understand why many won&#8217;t.  This is <strong>not</strong> your typical GNR.  In fact, if it weren&#8217;t Axl singing it, it could almost be a pop song.  It&#8217;s a nice interlude, not bad, a touch out of place, but probably reflective of the fact that Axl isn&#8217;t the same songwriter that he was 20 year ago(!). </p>
<p>We&#8217;re rocking again with <em>Scraped</em>, and I have to admit, I haven&#8217;t yet connected with this song.  I get it, I&#8217;ve heard it several times now, and other than the &#8220;ah-ah&#8221; Immigrant Song-ish section, I&#8217;m just not feeling it.  It kind of meanders around as a rock song.  </p>
<p>The next song is <em>Riad N&#8217; The Bedouins</em>.  Admittedly, I don&#8217;t know the backstory here, but I&#8217;ve seen references to it being based on a Arabic or Moroccan story.  Interesting that the song contains the line &#8220;<em>somewhere in time</em>,&#8221; which is an Iron Maiden album, and the term Bedouin, whic, according to <a href="http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/3530822107858749254/">one Internet comment</a>, &#8220;<em>are a group of Arab nomads who were partly the inspiration for the Fremen in Frank Herbert&#8217;s novel Dune.</em>&#8221;  Maiden did a song called &#8220;<em>To Tame a Land</em>,&#8221; which was all about Dune.  Either way, it&#8217;s a great song. </p>
<p>The next song is <em>Sorry</em>, which is a very non-GNR sounding power ballad.  It sounds more like Seether or some other modern band.  But &#8211; you know what &#8211; it&#8217;s a great song.  I like the chorus especially, it&#8217;s immediately memorable, and it&#8217;s got great harmony.  Those familiar with metal might liken it to Anthrax&#8217;s <em>Black Lodge </em>in tone.</p>
<p><em>I.R.S. </em>was also released on several pre-release leaked copies of <em>Chinese Democracy</em>.  I like it now as I did then, it&#8217;s definately GNR, definitely Axl, and definitely a typical GNR guitar line.  It&#8217;s one of my favorites on the album, but that may have to do with the fact that I&#8217;ve known the song for a few years now.  </p>
<p>Track 12 is <em>Madagascar.  </em>I hesitate to call it a power ballad, but it&#8217;s certainly a slower tempo rock song.  Decent, also present on previous leaked releases. </p>
<p>Certainly,<em> This I Love</em> is a ballad.  It&#8217;s nice, the first half isn&#8217;t much for me, since there is no drum track, and therefore, it never gets the power it should have until about 3 and half minutes into the song, at which point there&#8217;s a nice guitar solo, and the song takes shape.  It&#8217;s got a good flavor, but not necessarily as memorable as other tracks.   </p>
<p>The album closes with <em>Prostitute</em>, which, like <em>Catcher in the Rye</em>, could be a pop song.  If this was performed by Hannah Montana, it would absolutely be standard pop fare.  I actually like the song well enough, but I recognize that it&#8217;s just metal-ed up pop.  </p>
<p>In the end, <em>Chinese Democracy</em> holds its own surprisingly well.  In fact, all of the things I would have expected did not come true.  The production is nice and not overdone.  The songs are clean and not overlayered or overly engineered.   The same old Axl is there, but the sound is oddly current feeling.  </p>
<p>If you liked GNR before this album &#8211; particularly if you liked the Use Your Illusion albums, I think you will be very satisfied with Chinese Democracy.  And while you might think this is really just an Axl solo album, it feels an awful lot like classic GNR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/chinese-democracy-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check This Out: The Foo Fighters&#8217; The Colour and The Shape</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-the-colour-and-the-shape/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-the-colour-and-the-shape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check This Out!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1997&#8217;s The Colour and the Shape by The Foo Fighters is often overlooked, or more often only remembered for &#8220;My Hero,&#8221; &#8220;Everlong,&#8221; and &#8220;Monkey Wrench.&#8221; But it&#8217;s got some fantastic songs on it.  The intro, &#8220;Doll,&#8221; is a great little warm up.  Every song from &#8220;Hey Johnny Park!&#8221; through &#8220;New Way Home&#8221; is an interesting an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1997&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000QEIORG?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=firsttubecom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000QEIORG">The Colour and the Shape</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=firsttubecom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000QEIORG" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> by The Foo Fighters is often overlooked, or more often only remembered for &#8220;My Hero,&#8221; &#8220;Everlong,&#8221; and &#8220;Monkey Wrench.&#8221; But it&#8217;s got some fantastic songs on it.  The intro, &#8220;Doll,&#8221; is a great little warm up.  Every song from &#8220;Hey Johnny Park!&#8221; through &#8220;New Way Home&#8221; is an interesting an solitary adventure.  My personal favorite, &#8220;February Stars,&#8221; is keenly emotional, as is the slow &#8220;Walking After You.&#8221;  At the same time, &#8220;My Poor Brain&#8221; and &#8220;Wind Up&#8221; make for poppish, faster tunes that really can inspire excitement.   On top of that, all of the singles from the album have endured the test of time well, and all remain enjoyable rock songs that do not feel like overly faded denim.  </p>
<p>Quite the contrary: <strong>The Colour and The Shape</strong> remains The Foo Fighters&#8217; masterpiece, despite many subsequent hits. <strong>The Colour and The Shape</strong> proved that Dave Grohl could exist in a post-Nirvana band with its own identity.  </p>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_969" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/11/1afd808a8da0e2d005cf4110._aa240_.l.jpg" rel='lytebox[check-this-out-the-colour-and-the-shape]'><img class="size-full wp-image-969" title="1afd808a8da0e2d005cf4110._aa240_.l" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/11/1afd808a8da0e2d005cf4110._aa240_.l.jpg" alt="The Colour and The Shape" width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Colour and The Shape</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-the-colour-and-the-shape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check This Out: Drivin&#8217; N&#8217; Cryin&#8217;s Fly Me Courageous</title>
		<link>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-fly-me-courageous/</link>
		<comments>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-fly-me-courageous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check This Out!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I&#8217;m going to post an album recommendation.  I have lots of &#8220;favorite&#8221; albums, but I&#8217;m going to share a few that I find especially good.  Today brings an album that really captures the flavor of rock in the early 1990s.
In the early 90s, Guns N&#8217; Roses had successfully killed off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, I&#8217;m going to post an album recommendation.  I have lots of &#8220;favorite&#8221; albums, but I&#8217;m going to share a few that I find especially good.  Today brings an album that really captures the flavor of rock in the early 1990s.</p>
<p>In the early 90s, Guns N&#8217; Roses had successfully killed off hair metal in favor of accessible heavy metal.  That changed when the Use Your Illusion albums came out &#8211; as &#8220;rock&#8221; more than metal &#8211; and rock softened up a little.  Bands like Mr. Big and Firehouse were suddenly relevant.  A little known Southern band who had been around since the mid-80s dropped into the scene with a fantastic album called &#8220;<strong>Fly Me Courageous</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Fly Me Courageous</strong> features several great songs besides the title track which became a successful single, most notably &#8220;Let&#8217;s Go Dancing.&#8221;  Other songs such as &#8220;For You,&#8221; &#8220;Look What You&#8217;ve Done to Your Brother,&#8221; and &#8220;Around the Block Again&#8221; are really great songs that are a throwback to that period in rock music.  While it certainly won&#8217;t feel like current music, it will certainly prove to be a successful demonstration of just good, catchy song writing.        </p>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_959" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><a href="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/11/17455.jpg" rel='lytebox[check-this-out-fly-me-courageous]'><img class="size-medium wp-image-959" title="Fly Me Courageous" src="http://firsttube.com/uploads/2008/11/17455.jpg" alt="Fly Me Courageous" width="280" height="274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fly Me Courageous</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firsttube.com/read/check-this-out-fly-me-courageous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
